calculation-standards.md
194 lines · plugins/vertical-plugins/investment-banking/skills/pitch-deck/reference/calculation-standards.md at 6056506
Calculation Verification Reference
This file provides formulas and guidelines for verifying pre-calculated values in source data before populating templates. Source data should already contain calculated figures—use these formulas to verify accuracy.
Raw lines 1 to 4Contents
- Key Verification Formulas
- Consensus Methodology
- Rounding Guidelines
- Verification Checklist
- Red Flags to Investigate
Raw lines 5 to 14
Key Verification Formulas
Raw lines 15 to 16CAGR Projection
Formula:
Future Value = Present Value × (1 + CAGR)^nVariables:
- Present Value: Current/base year market size
- CAGR: Compound Annual Growth Rate (as decimal, e.g., 16.4% = 0.164)
- n: Number of years between base and target year
Verification example:
Source claims: $22.1bn (2024) at 16.4% CAGR = $55.0bn (2030)
Verify: 22.1 × (1.164)^6 = 22.1 × 2.488 = 55.0 ✓Calculating n (years): Count years between base and target year. Examples: 2024→2030 = 6 years, 2025→2030 = 5 years.
Raw lines 17 to 37Valuation Multiples
EV/Revenue:
EV/Revenue Multiple = Enterprise Value ÷ Revenue
Implied EV = Revenue × MultipleEV/EBITDA:
EV/EBITDA Multiple = Enterprise Value ÷ EBITDA
Implied EV = EBITDA × MultipleVerification example:
Source claims: $436m deal at 9.7x revenue multiple on $45m revenue
Verify: 436 ÷ 45 = 9.69 ≈ 9.7x ✓Raw lines 38 to 58Market Share
Formula:
Market Share = (Segment Size ÷ Total Market Size) × 100Verification example:
Source claims: Online segment ($18bn) is 28% of total market ($65bn)
Verify: 18 ÷ 65 = 0.277 = 27.7% ≈ 28% ✓Raw lines 59 to 72Growth Rate
Year-over-Year:
YoY Growth = (Current Year - Prior Year) ÷ Prior Year × 100CAGR from endpoints:
CAGR = (End Value ÷ Start Value)^(1/n) - 1Raw lines 73 to 86
Consensus Methodology
When source data contains multiple estimates, verify consensus calculations:
Raw lines 87 to 90Size Consensus (Range)
Method: Full min-max range across all sources
Example:
Sources: $14.9bn, $18.3bn, $21.1bn, $21.2bn, $22.1bn
Consensus: $15-22bn (rounded to nearest $1bn)Raw lines 91 to 100CAGR Consensus (Central Cluster)
Method: Exclude outliers (highest and lowest), use central cluster range
Example:
Sources: 10.6%, 16.4%, 17.2%, 19.0%, 22.7%
Exclude outliers: 10.6% (low), 22.7% (high)
Central cluster: 16.4%, 17.2%, 19.0%
Consensus: 16-19% or 16-17% (conservative)Raw lines 101 to 112Projection Consensus
Method: Apply consensus CAGR to midpoint of size range
Example:
Size range: $15-22bn → Midpoint: $18.5bn
CAGR consensus: 16-17%
At 16%: 18.5 × (1.16)^6 = $45.1bn
At 17%: 18.5 × (1.17)^6 = $47.5bn
Consensus projection: $45-48bnRaw lines 113 to 127
Rounding Guidelines
These are typical conventions — adjust based on the magnitude of values and template style:
| Value Type | Typical Rounding | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Large market sizes ($10bn+) | Nearest $1bn | 18.47 → $18bn |
| Smaller market sizes (<$10bn) | Nearest $0.5bn or $0.1bn | 2.3 → $2.5bn |
| Size ranges | Match precision of sources | 14.9-22.1 → $15-22bn |
| CAGR | Whole % or 0.5% | 16.4% → 16% or 16.5% |
| Market share | Nearest 5% or match source | 27.7% → 25% or 30% |
| Revenue ($m) | 1 decimal | 18.47 → $18.5m |
| Multiples | 1 decimal | 9.688 → 9.7x |
Rounding principles:
- Rounding should not materially change the figure — for smaller values, use finer precision
- Consistency matters more than precision — use same rounding across similar figures
- When creating ranges, round down for low end, round up for high end
- For summary statistics (mean, median), match precision of input data
Raw lines 128 to 149
Formula Verification
- [ ] Projection uses correct CAGR formula:
PV × (1 + r)^n - [ ] Multiples calculated as EV ÷ Metric (not reversed)
- [ ] Growth rates use correct base year in denominator
- [ ] Percentage shares sum to ~100% where applicable
Input Verification
- [ ] Base year figures match source documents
- [ ] CAGR/growth rates match stated source methodology
- [ ] Time periods (n) calculated correctly
- [ ] Currency and units consistent ($bn vs $m)
Output Verification
- [ ] Calculated result matches source's stated figure
- [ ] If mismatch, investigate methodology difference
- [ ] Rounding applied consistently
- [ ] Results are plausible (no order-of-magnitude errors)
Consensus Verification
- [ ] All sources included in range calculations
- [ ] Outlier exclusion methodology documented
- [ ] Midpoint calculations use correct averaging
- [ ] Range bounds represent actual min/max or documented subset
Raw lines 172 to 179
Red Flags to Investigate
Projection mismatches:
- Calculated projection differs from source by >5%
- Likely cause: Different base year, different CAGR, or rounding
Multiple mismatches:
- Calculated multiple differs from source
- Likely cause: Different metric definition (LTM vs. NTM, Revenue vs. Net Revenue)
Consensus mismatches:
- Your consensus differs from source's consensus
- Likely cause: Source excluded certain data points, different outlier treatment
When in doubt: Note the discrepancy in a footnote and show your calculation methodology.
Raw lines 180 to 194