scoring.md
92 lines · small-business/skills/lead-finder/reference/scoring.md at 2574e29
Scoring
Three components. The score decides the order the owner works the list in, which is the main thing the list is for.
score = (fit x 0.4) + (signal x 0.4) + (reachability x 0.2)Each component runs 0 to 10. Signal is weighted equal to fit deliberately — a good-fit company with nothing happening is a cold call, and cold calls are what the owner was already doing badly.
Raw lines 1 to 12
Fit — 40%
How closely the company matches the profile from icp_method.md.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 9–10 | Matches every profile criterion |
| 7–8 | Matches the core criteria, off on one secondary dimension |
| 5–6 | Plausible, but missing something that matters |
| 3–4 | Adjacent — worth including only if signal is strong |
| 0–2 | Do not include it |
If the profile has a counter-pattern ("under 10 employees churns"), a company matching the counter-pattern caps at 4 regardless of everything else.
Raw lines 13 to 28
Signal — 40%
Evidence something is happening right now. This is the difference between a prospect list and a directory.
| Signal | Score | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| New location, expansion, or major permit filed | 10 | They are spending and their existing vendors may not scale |
| Hiring for a role related to what the owner sells | 9 | Budget already approved |
| Leadership or ownership change | 8 | New decision-makers re-evaluate vendors |
| Funding, acquisition, or major contract won | 8 | Money and new needs at once |
| Recent poor reviews of their current provider | 8 | Active dissatisfaction, usually the warmest signal available |
| Seasonal timing matches their buying cycle | 6 | Right time, no specific trigger |
| Recent website or brand refresh | 5 | Investing, but weak evidence of need |
| Nothing found | 2 | Not disqualifying, just cold |
A signal needs a date and a source. "Expanding" is a rumor. "Filed a permit for a second location on Mar 14, county records" is a reason to call this week.
Never invent a signal. A prospect list with fabricated triggers destroys the owner's credibility on the first call, and they will never trust the skill again.
Raw lines 29 to 49
Reachability — 20%
How directly the owner can get in front of the decision-maker.
| Route | Score |
|---|---|
| Shared customer or mutual connection who would introduce | 10 |
| Named decision-maker with a verified direct contact | 8 |
| Named decision-maker, contact inferred but unverified | 6 |
| Named person, but not the decision-maker | 4 |
| General company contact only | 3 |
| No contact route found | 1 |
Warm paths are worth hunting for. Cross-check target companies against the owner's existing customer list, shared associations, and overlapping geography. A referral route converts several times better than anything cold, and owners consistently underestimate how many they already have.
Raw lines 50 to 66
Presenting the score
Show the rank and the reason, not the arithmetic. Owners do not want to see a weighted formula; they want to know why this company is number three.
Bad:
Ridgeline Property Group — score 8.4Good:
3. Ridgeline Property Group — 6 buildings, 18 miles out.
Filed a permit for a 7th on Mar 14. Their current HVAC vendor has
three 2-star reviews this quarter. Contact: Dana Whitfield, Facilities
Director, direct line verified.Same score. Only one of them gets called.
Raw lines 67 to 87
Ties and cutoffs
Break ties toward signal recency. A trigger from last week beats one from last quarter.
Anything scoring below 4 does not go on the list at all. Including weak rows to reach a target count is the fastest way to make the ranking meaningless, and the ranking is the product.
Raw lines 88 to 92