Skill Tracer
Skills › Knowledge Work Plugins › growth-pulse › gotchas.md

gotchas.md

175 lines · small-business/skills/growth-pulse/reference/gotchas.md at 2574e29

Open on GitHub
1# Gotchas
2
3Failure modes that produce confidently wrong growth advice. Owners move real budget off this pulse, so a plausible-sounding mistake here costs money.
4
5---
6

Gotchas

Failure modes that produce confidently wrong growth advice. Owners move real budget off this pulse, so a plausible-sounding mistake here costs money.

Raw lines 1 to 6
7## Gotcha: recommending more spend on a saturating channel
8
9**Why it matters:** Rising spend with rising cost per lead means the channel is running out of audience, not scaling. "It's working, spend more" is the single most expensive wrong call this skill can make.

Gotcha: recommending more spend on a saturating channel

Why it matters: Rising spend with rising cost per lead means the channel is running out of audience, not scaling. "It's working, spend more" is the single most expensive wrong call this skill can make.

Raw lines 7 to 10
11### Bad
13```
14Paid social drove 47 leads, up from 29. Recommend increasing budget 50%.
15```
17Spend went from USD 900 to USD 3,200 and cost per lead went from USD 31 to USD 68. Volume rose because spend rose. Efficiency collapsed.

Bad

Paid social drove 47 leads, up from 29. Recommend increasing budget 50%.

Spend went from USD 900 to USD 3,200 and cost per lead went from USD 31 to USD 68. Volume rose because spend rose. Efficiency collapsed.

Raw lines 11 to 18
19### Good
21```
22Paid-social volume is up but cost per lead rose from USD 31 to USD 68 as spend tripled.
23That's saturation, not scale. Hold budget flat and fix creative before adding
24more — another 50% of budget likely buys leads at USD 90.
25```
27Always check cost per lead against spend before recommending budget in either direction.
29---

Good

Paid-social volume is up but cost per lead rose from USD 31 to USD 68 as spend tripled.
That's saturation, not scale. Hold budget flat and fix creative before adding
more — another 50% of budget likely buys leads at USD 90.

Always check cost per lead against spend before recommending budget in either direction.

Raw lines 19 to 30
31## Gotcha: reporting CRM deal value as revenue
33**Why it matters:** Weighted pipeline is a forecast. Presenting it next to real revenue, in the same format, makes it read as money in the bank.

Gotcha: reporting CRM deal value as revenue

Why it matters: Weighted pipeline is a forecast. Presenting it next to real revenue, in the same format, makes it read as money in the bank.

Raw lines 31 to 34
35### Bad
37```
38Revenue — USD 214,000
39```
41Where USD 86,000 is invoices and USD 128,000 is open pipeline.

Bad

Revenue — USD 214,000

Where USD 86,000 is invoices and USD 128,000 is open pipeline.

Raw lines 35 to 42
43### Good
45```
46Revenue — USD 86,400 (invoiced)
47Pipeline — USD 128,000 open, weighted USD 41,000 (forecast, not booked)
48```
50Label the forecast every time. Owners plan hiring off these numbers.
52---

Good

Revenue — USD 86,400 (invoiced)
Pipeline — USD 128,000 open, weighted USD 41,000 (forecast, not booked)

Label the forecast every time. Owners plan hiring off these numbers.

Raw lines 43 to 53
54## Gotcha: inventing attribution
56**Why it matters:** When a campaign's revenue can't be traced, assigning it on a guess produces a return figure that looks authoritative and is fiction. Budgets move on these numbers.

Gotcha: inventing attribution

Why it matters: When a campaign's revenue can't be traced, assigning it on a guess produces a return figure that looks authoritative and is fiction. Budgets move on these numbers.

Raw lines 54 to 57
58### Bad
60```
61Paid social return: 3.4x
62```
64Derived by assuming every new customer that month came from paid social.

Bad

Paid social return: 3.4x

Derived by assuming every new customer that month came from paid social.

Raw lines 58 to 65
66### Good
68```
69Paid social: USD 3,200 spend, 47 leads at USD 18 each. Revenue attribution unavailable —
70the CRM isn't capturing source on closed deals. Cost per lead is solid; whether
71those leads convert is the open question. Turning on source tracking would
72answer it next month.
73```
75An honest gap with a fix is more useful than a confident fake number.
77---

Good

Paid social: USD 3,200 spend, 47 leads at USD 18 each. Revenue attribution unavailable —
the CRM isn't capturing source on closed deals. Cost per lead is solid; whether
those leads convert is the open question. Turning on source tracking would
answer it next month.

An honest gap with a fix is more useful than a confident fake number.

Raw lines 66 to 78
79## Gotcha: the platform's numbers and the CRM's numbers disagree
81**Why it matters:** The ad platform will claim 60 conversions while the CRM shows 41 leads. This is normal — different attribution windows, different definitions. Picking whichever is flattering misleads.

Gotcha: the platform's numbers and the CRM's numbers disagree

Why it matters: The ad platform will claim 60 conversions while the CRM shows 41 leads. This is normal — different attribution windows, different definitions. Picking whichever is flattering misleads.

Raw lines 79 to 82
83### Bad
85Report 60, because it's the bigger number and it came from the ad platform.

Bad

Report 60, because it's the bigger number and it came from the ad platform.

Raw lines 83 to 86
87### Good
89```
90The ad platform reports 60 conversions; the CRM received 41 leads with it as the source.
91The 19-lead gap is normal attribution difference. Using the CRM number, since
92that's what your team actually worked.
93```
95Report both, name the gap, and say which you used and why.
97---

Good

The ad platform reports 60 conversions; the CRM received 41 leads with it as the source.
The 19-lead gap is normal attribution difference. Using the CRM number, since
that's what your team actually worked.

Report both, name the gap, and say which you used and why.

Raw lines 87 to 98
99## Gotcha: one product carrying the entire trend
101**Why it matters:** "Revenue up 12%" reads as broad health. If one SKU accounts for all of it and the other nine are flat or down, the business is more fragile than the headline suggests.

Gotcha: one product carrying the entire trend

Why it matters: "Revenue up 12%" reads as broad health. If one SKU accounts for all of it and the other nine are flat or down, the business is more fragile than the headline suggests.

Raw lines 99 to 102
103### Bad
105```
106Revenue up 12%. Growth engine is healthy.
107```

Bad

Revenue up 12%. Growth engine is healthy.
Raw lines 103 to 108
109### Good
111```
112Revenue up 12%, but entirely from one product — the summer bundle, up USD 9,800.
113Every other product is flat or down. The headline is real; the breadth isn't.
114```
116Always check whether the trend survives removing the top mover.
118---

Good

Revenue up 12%, but entirely from one product — the summer bundle, up USD 9,800.
Every other product is flat or down. The headline is real; the breadth isn't.

Always check whether the trend survives removing the top mover.

Raw lines 109 to 119
120## Gotcha: burying the funnel drop-off
122**Why it matters:** The stage where the funnel loses the most is usually the highest-value finding available, and it is almost always cheaper to fix than any new campaign. It gets buried because it isn't a headline number.

Gotcha: burying the funnel drop-off

Why it matters: The stage where the funnel loses the most is usually the highest-value finding available, and it is almost always cheaper to fix than any new campaign. It gets buried because it isn't a headline number.

Raw lines 120 to 123
124### Bad
126Lead with revenue and channel mix. Mention stage conversion in a bullet halfway down.

Bad

Lead with revenue and channel mix. Mention stage conversion in a bullet halfway down.

Raw lines 124 to 127
128### Good
130If one stage is losing more than 70% of what enters it, that is the headline sentence of the whole pulse, regardless of what revenue did.
132---

Good

If one stage is losing more than 70% of what enters it, that is the headline sentence of the whole pulse, regardless of what revenue did.

Raw lines 128 to 133
134## Gotcha: manufacturing three actions on a quiet month
136**Why it matters:** If every pulse produces three urgent actions, the owner learns the actions are filler and stops reading them. The credibility of the recommendation is the asset.

Gotcha: manufacturing three actions on a quiet month

Why it matters: If every pulse produces three urgent actions, the owner learns the actions are filler and stops reading them. The credibility of the recommendation is the asset.

Raw lines 134 to 137
138### Bad
140```
1411. Consider testing a new ad channel.
1422. Review your pricing.
1433. Think about a referral program.
144```
146Generic, unprompted by any number in the pulse.

Bad

1. Consider testing a new ad channel.
2. Review your pricing.
3. Think about a referral program.

Generic, unprompted by any number in the pulse.

Raw lines 138 to 147
148### Good
150```
1511. Nothing urgent this week. The engine is steady.
152 The one thing worth watching: referral share has grown three months running
153 with no effort behind it. Worth a deliberate test next month.
154```
156---

Good

1. Nothing urgent this week. The engine is steady.
   The one thing worth watching: referral share has grown three months running
   with no effort behind it. Worth a deliberate test next month.
Raw lines 148 to 157
158## Gotcha: marketing vocabulary the owner doesn't use
160**Why it matters:** This audience is owner-operators, often the entire marketing department. Funnel-speak makes the pulse feel like it was written for someone else.

Gotcha: marketing vocabulary the owner doesn't use

Why it matters: This audience is owner-operators, often the entire marketing department. Funnel-speak makes the pulse feel like it was written for someone else.

Raw lines 158 to 161
162### Bad
164```
165Top-of-funnel velocity improved while MQL-to-SQL conversion degraded.
166```

Bad

Top-of-funnel velocity improved while MQL-to-SQL conversion degraded.
Raw lines 162 to 167
168### Good
170```
171More new leads came in than last month, but fewer of them turned into real
172opportunities.
173```
175Same finding. One of them gets acted on.

Good

More new leads came in than last month, but fewer of them turned into real
opportunities.

Same finding. One of them gets acted on.

Raw lines 168 to 175