Skill Tracer
Skills › Scientific Agent Skills › research-grants › nih_guidelines.md

nih_guidelines.md

199 lines · skills/research-grants/references/nih_guidelines.md at 5f2bc03

Open on GitHub
1# NIH application guidance
2
3Reviewed 2026-10-01. Start from a specific active NOFO, its amendments, related NIH
4Guide notices, due date, activity code, and application form package. Since October
52025, [Grants.gov is the official source of NIH funding opportunities](https://www.grants.nih.gov/funding/explore-nih-opportunities);
6the NIH Guide continues to carry policy notices. An old Guide NOFO or a RePORTER award
7is not proof of current availability or eligibility.
8

NIH application guidance

Reviewed 2026-10-01. Start from a specific active NOFO, its amendments, related NIH Guide notices, due date, activity code, and application form package. Since October 2025, Grants.gov is the official source of NIH funding opportunities; the NIH Guide continues to carry policy notices. An old Guide NOFO or a RePORTER award is not proof of current availability or eligibility.

Raw lines 1 to 8
9## Appropriate assistance and applicant ownership
11[NIH policy](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/HTML5/section_2/2.3.7_policies_affecting_applications.htm)
12permits limited AI assistance but will not consider applications, or sections,
13substantially developed by AI to be applicants' original ideas. Use this skill to
14extract requirements, critique investigator-authored material, check consistency and
15calculations, and suggest limited edits. Keep the scientific ideas, interpretation,
16and substantive application development with the applicant; human review alone does
17not erase the policy. Never invent preliminary findings, citations, collaborators,
18patient access, credentials, or commitments. The same policy section limits an
19individual PD/PI or MPI to six covered applications per council calendar year, with
20specified activity-code exclusions; verify how the limit applies before planning
21multiple submissions.

Appropriate assistance and applicant ownership

NIH policy permits limited AI assistance but will not consider applications, or sections, substantially developed by AI to be applicants' original ideas. Use this skill to extract requirements, critique investigator-authored material, check consistency and calculations, and suggest limited edits. Keep the scientific ideas, interpretation, and substantive application development with the applicant; human review alone does not erase the policy. Never invent preliminary findings, citations, collaborators, patient access, credentials, or commitments. The same policy section limits an individual PD/PI or MPI to six covered applications per council calendar year, with specified activity-code exclusions; verify how the limit applies before planning multiple submissions.

Raw lines 9 to 22
23## Review framework
25For most research project grants with due dates on/after January 25, 2025, use the
26[simplified review framework](https://www.grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/peer-review/simplifying-review/framework):
28| Factor | Applicant's evidence | Assessment |
29| --- | --- | --- |
30| Importance of the Research | Important gap and contribution; significance and innovation | 1-9 |
31| Rigor and Feasibility | Design, analysis, sample-size justification, bias control, alternatives, timeline | 1-9 |
32| Expertise and Resources | Project-specific capabilities, facilities, access and missing expertise | Sufficiency, not a separate numeric score |
34All three affect overall impact. This is not a weighted average. Additional review
35criteria, including applicable human-subject and animal protections, may affect
36impact despite lacking standalone scores; budget appropriateness is a different
37review consideration. Check Section V of the NOFO: fellowships, K awards, small
38business, and complex multi-project mechanisms need their own review instructions.
39The research narrative still uses Significance, Innovation, and Approach where the
40application instructions require them; do not rename these to the review factors.
42[NOT-OD-26-114](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-114.html)
43continues modified practices for the January 2027 Advisory Council: most meetings
44discuss 30-35% of applications; a middle category is competitive but not discussed.
45Such applications can still be considered for funding. Summary statements are
46simplified. Do not promise that half will be discussed or classify an application as
47unfundable solely because it was not discussed. Overall impact scores for discussed
48applications normally run 10-90; do not map a score to an agency-wide funding chance.

Review framework

For most research project grants with due dates on/after January 25, 2025, use the simplified review framework:

FactorApplicant's evidenceAssessment
Importance of the ResearchImportant gap and contribution; significance and innovation1-9
Rigor and FeasibilityDesign, analysis, sample-size justification, bias control, alternatives, timeline1-9
Expertise and ResourcesProject-specific capabilities, facilities, access and missing expertiseSufficiency, not a separate numeric score

All three affect overall impact. This is not a weighted average. Additional review criteria, including applicable human-subject and animal protections, may affect impact despite lacking standalone scores; budget appropriateness is a different review consideration. Check Section V of the NOFO: fellowships, K awards, small business, and complex multi-project mechanisms need their own review instructions. The research narrative still uses Significance, Innovation, and Approach where the application instructions require them; do not rename these to the review factors.

NOT-OD-26-114 continues modified practices for the January 2027 Advisory Council: most meetings discuss 30-35% of applications; a middle category is competitive but not discussed. Such applications can still be considered for funding. Summary statements are simplified. Do not promise that half will be discussed or classify an application as unfundable solely because it was not discussed. Overall impact scores for discussed applications normally run 10-90; do not map a score to an agency-wide funding chance.

Raw lines 23 to 49
50## Narrative and attachments
52Use the [current page-limit table](https://grants.nih.gov/grants-process/write-application/how-to-apply-application-guide/page-limits)
53and the NOFO. For standard R01 applications, Specific Aims is **up to one page** and
54Research Strategy up to 12; for standard R03/R21 the strategy is generally six. The
55Project Summary/Abstract is generally at most 30 lines, and Project Narrative at most
56three sentences. These are maxima, not required exact lengths or interchangeable
57components. Check exceptions rather than shrinking type to fit.
59An aims page should connect the gap, objective, investigator's hypothesis or research
60question, achievable aims, expected knowledge, and impact. Two or three aims may work
61well, but NIH has no universal required number. Avoid making all later aims depend on
62one uncertain result; state alternatives. See [specific_aims_guide.md](specific_aims_guide.md)
63for illustrative writing patterns, not a ready-to-submit application.
65For the research strategy:
671. **Significance:** identify the important barrier and what resolving it changes.
68 Cite the strengths and limitations of prior evidence, not just disease burden.
692. **Innovation:** explain the actual conceptual or technical advance. Do not claim
70 that all worthwhile NIH research must be revolutionary.
713. **Approach:** connect each aim to design, subjects/models, controls, randomization
72 and blinding where appropriate, sample-size rationale, analysis, quality controls,
73 plausible outcomes, pitfalls, alternatives, resources, and a realistic timeline.
74 Separate observed preliminary results from predictions. Do not present a power
75 calculation as meaningful without its effect-size/variance assumptions.
77Follow [attachment requirements](https://www.grants.nih.gov/grants-process/write-application/how-to-apply-application-guide/format-attachments):
78PDF; ordinarily at least 11-point body text, no more than 15 characters per horizontal
79inch or six lines per vertical inch, and at least half-inch margins. Smaller graphic
80text may be acceptable if legible at 100%. Check searchable text, embedded fonts,
81filenames and file limits in the actual package. Do not put overflow narrative in
82appendices or hyperlinks. Preserve SciENcv-generated certification in its PDF instead
83of printing or altering it to imitate a manually formatted attachment.

Narrative and attachments

Use the current page-limit table and the NOFO. For standard R01 applications, Specific Aims is up to one page and Research Strategy up to 12; for standard R03/R21 the strategy is generally six. The Project Summary/Abstract is generally at most 30 lines, and Project Narrative at most three sentences. These are maxima, not required exact lengths or interchangeable components. Check exceptions rather than shrinking type to fit.

An aims page should connect the gap, objective, investigator's hypothesis or research question, achievable aims, expected knowledge, and impact. Two or three aims may work well, but NIH has no universal required number. Avoid making all later aims depend on one uncertain result; state alternatives. See specific_aims_guide.md for illustrative writing patterns, not a ready-to-submit application.

For the research strategy:

  1. Significance: identify the important barrier and what resolving it changes. Cite the strengths and limitations of prior evidence, not just disease burden.
  2. Innovation: explain the actual conceptual or technical advance. Do not claim that all worthwhile NIH research must be revolutionary.
  3. Approach: connect each aim to design, subjects/models, controls, randomization and blinding where appropriate, sample-size rationale, analysis, quality controls, plausible outcomes, pitfalls, alternatives, resources, and a realistic timeline. Separate observed preliminary results from predictions. Do not present a power calculation as meaningful without its effect-size/variance assumptions.

Follow attachment requirements: PDF; ordinarily at least 11-point body text, no more than 15 characters per horizontal inch or six lines per vertical inch, and at least half-inch margins. Smaller graphic text may be acceptable if legible at 100%. Check searchable text, embedded fonts, filenames and file limits in the actual package. Do not put overflow narrative in appendices or hyperlinks. Preserve SciENcv-generated certification in its PDF instead of printing or altering it to imitate a manually formatted attachment.

Raw lines 50 to 84
85## Common Forms, disclosures, and data sharing
87For application due dates and relevant JIT/RPPR/prior-approval submissions on/after
88January 25, 2026, NIH requires Common Forms; enforcement began May 8, 2026.
89Use [SciENcv for the Biographical Sketch Common Form and NIH Supplement](https://www.grants.nih.gov/grants-process/write-application/forms-directory/biographical-sketch-common-form)
90and the Current and Pending (Other) Support Common Form. There is no downloadable
91blank substitute for the SciENcv biosketch. Each investigator must review and certify
92accurate records, supply the required ORCID linkage to eRA Commons, and follow the
93current field limits. Do not reuse the retired five-page Word biosketch format.
94Other Support includes applicable external support and in-kind resources; reconcile
95scientific, budgetary, and commitment overlap with the actual instructions.
97For data-generating activities covered by the DMS policy, use the updated structured
98plan format required for competing applications from May 25, 2026 under
99[NOT-OD-26-046](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-046.html).
100[NOT-OD-26-100](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-100.html)
101explains JIT/RPPR transitions and, effective October 1, 2026, reporting plan changes in
102RPPR C.5.c rather than obtaining DMS-plan prior approval. Check applicability and
103format for the mechanism; do not substitute a generic NSF plan. Cost data management,
104curation and sharing explicitly, with justified access restrictions.

Common Forms, disclosures, and data sharing

For application due dates and relevant JIT/RPPR/prior-approval submissions on/after January 25, 2026, NIH requires Common Forms; enforcement began May 8, 2026. Use SciENcv for the Biographical Sketch Common Form and NIH Supplement and the Current and Pending (Other) Support Common Form. There is no downloadable blank substitute for the SciENcv biosketch. Each investigator must review and certify accurate records, supply the required ORCID linkage to eRA Commons, and follow the current field limits. Do not reuse the retired five-page Word biosketch format. Other Support includes applicable external support and in-kind resources; reconcile scientific, budgetary, and commitment overlap with the actual instructions.

For data-generating activities covered by the DMS policy, use the updated structured plan format required for competing applications from May 25, 2026 under NOT-OD-26-046. NOT-OD-26-100 explains JIT/RPPR transitions and, effective October 1, 2026, reporting plan changes in RPPR C.5.c rather than obtaining DMS-plan prior approval. Check applicability and format for the mechanism; do not substitute a generic NSF plan. Cost data management, curation and sharing explicitly, with justified access restrictions.

Raw lines 85 to 105
106## Mechanism selection
108- **R01:** individual research project; not limited to established investigators.
109 Preliminary studies normally support feasibility; the instructions and NOFO determine
110 requirements. There is no universal $250,000 minimum or maximum award budget.
111- **R21:** exploratory/developmental; the [activity-code guidance](https://www.grants.nih.gov/funding/activity-codes/r21)
112 describes up to $275,000 direct costs across two years, no more than $200,000 in one
113 year, and no required preliminary data. It is not renewable; that is different from
114 a categorical ban on no-cost extensions. Check participating ICs and the NOFO.
115- **R03:** small-scope research; use the active NOFO for budget, period and eligibility.
116- **R15:** distinguish AREA and REAP eligibility; institutional research funding and
117 student populations matter, not simply a label of "undergraduate institution."
118- **K and fellowship awards:** check degree, citizenship/residency, career stage,
119 protected effort, mentor/reference requirements, and IC-specific salary/research
120 allowances. A K award is not a research-project grant with an extra training paragraph.
121- **U/P/R35 and other codes:** use mechanism-specific scope and instructions. R35 is
122 not synonymous with the NIGMS MIRA program across NIH.
124[NOT-OD-26-098](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-098.html)
125announces K-program changes for due dates on/after **October 12, 2027**, including
126consolidated codes, DMS-plan changes and clinical-trial restrictions. Do not apply
127those future rules to an October 2026 application merely because the notice exists.

Mechanism selection

  • R01: individual research project; not limited to established investigators. Preliminary studies normally support feasibility; the instructions and NOFO determine requirements. There is no universal $250,000 minimum or maximum award budget.
  • R21: exploratory/developmental; the activity-code guidance describes up to $275,000 direct costs across two years, no more than $200,000 in one year, and no required preliminary data. It is not renewable; that is different from a categorical ban on no-cost extensions. Check participating ICs and the NOFO.
  • R03: small-scope research; use the active NOFO for budget, period and eligibility.
  • R15: distinguish AREA and REAP eligibility; institutional research funding and student populations matter, not simply a label of "undergraduate institution."
  • K and fellowship awards: check degree, citizenship/residency, career stage, protected effort, mentor/reference requirements, and IC-specific salary/research allowances. A K award is not a research-project grant with an extra training paragraph.
  • U/P/R35 and other codes: use mechanism-specific scope and instructions. R35 is not synonymous with the NIGMS MIRA program across NIH.

NOT-OD-26-098 announces K-program changes for due dates on/after October 12, 2027, including consolidated codes, DMS-plan changes and clinical-trial restrictions. Do not apply those future rules to an October 2026 application merely because the notice exists.

Raw lines 106 to 128
129## Budget
131Select the budget form using the NOFO and organization eligibility. For eligible
132applications, [modular budgets](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/developing_budget.htm)
133request $25,000 modules, up to $250,000 direct costs per budget period **excluding
134consortium F&A**. Foreign institutions and SBIR/STTR do not use the modular format.
135Build a detailed internal estimate even when only a modular narrative is submitted.
136Modular personnel justification states names, roles and person-months, not salary or
137fringe rates. Explain variation in modules; there is no generic $125,000/25% rule.
139The FY2026 Executive Level II cap is $228,000 effective January 1, 2026, as corrected by
140[NOT-OD-26-038](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-038.html).
141The September 28 [continuing-resolution notice](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-131.html)
142continues FY2026 fiscal policies through December 11, 2026. Recheck for later awards.
143Use actual institutional salary, appointment basis and effort; the cap is not a salary
144recommendation. There is no general one-month PI effort limit. An NRSA stipend is not
145an employee postdoctoral salary scale.
147Use the applicable negotiated F&A rate and base. **NIH does not impose a blanket 8%
148F&A rate on domestic subawards.** Do not apply the revised federal $50,000 MTDC
149subaward threshold automatically: [NOT-OD-26-072](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-072.html)
150rescinded NIH implementation of revised MTDC/de-minimis provisions. Verify the
151applicable $25,000 treatment, agreement, and current fiscal instructions with the
152institution. Equipment classification also uses the current NIH form instructions
153and the institution's lower capitalization threshold where applicable.
155Foreign collaborations no longer use ordinary nested foreign subawards for new
156applications. Consult the [current subaward policy](https://www.grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/subawards)
157and [PF5 instructions](https://grants.nih.gov/funding/activity-codes/pf5) for eligible
158linked domestic/foreign award routes. Do not infer eligibility from a legacy budget
159webpage's mention of an 8% foreign consortium rate.

Budget

Select the budget form using the NOFO and organization eligibility. For eligible applications, modular budgets request $25,000 modules, up to $250,000 direct costs per budget period excluding consortium F&A. Foreign institutions and SBIR/STTR do not use the modular format. Build a detailed internal estimate even when only a modular narrative is submitted. Modular personnel justification states names, roles and person-months, not salary or fringe rates. Explain variation in modules; there is no generic $125,000/25% rule.

The FY2026 Executive Level II cap is $228,000 effective January 1, 2026, as corrected by NOT-OD-26-038. The September 28 continuing-resolution notice continues FY2026 fiscal policies through December 11, 2026. Recheck for later awards. Use actual institutional salary, appointment basis and effort; the cap is not a salary recommendation. There is no general one-month PI effort limit. An NRSA stipend is not an employee postdoctoral salary scale.

Use the applicable negotiated F&A rate and base. NIH does not impose a blanket 8% F&A rate on domestic subawards. Do not apply the revised federal $50,000 MTDC subaward threshold automatically: NOT-OD-26-072 rescinded NIH implementation of revised MTDC/de-minimis provisions. Verify the applicable $25,000 treatment, agreement, and current fiscal instructions with the institution. Equipment classification also uses the current NIH form instructions and the institution's lower capitalization threshold where applicable.

Foreign collaborations no longer use ordinary nested foreign subawards for new applications. Consult the current subaward policy and PF5 instructions for eligible linked domestic/foreign award routes. Do not infer eligibility from a legacy budget webpage's mention of an 8% foreign consortium rate.

Raw lines 129 to 160
161## Submission and deadlines
163Use the NOFO's Key Dates and current
164[standard-date table](https://www.grants.nih.gov/grants-process/submit/submission-policies/standard-due-dates).
165For example, standard *new R01* dates are February/June/October 5; R01 A1 dates differ.
166NIH no longer uses dedicated AIDS deadlines after the 2026 transition. Dates are
167normally 5 p.m. applicant-organization local time; check weekends, federal holidays,
168late-submission rules and any emergency notices. Do not infer eligibility for late or
169continuous submission from old service history.
171ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace, and supported institutional system-to-system software
172are preparation/submission options. ASSIST routes through Grants.gov; eRA Commons is
173used to track receipt, errors and the assembled application, not an alternative
174public submission API. Confirm UEI/SAM, Grants.gov, organization/PI Commons accounts,
175affiliation and authorized signing roles well in advance. Do not assume registration
176will finish within a fixed number of days. Review validation errors and the assembled
177application within the applicable viewing/correction window.
179[NOT-OD-26-094](https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-26-094.html)
180announces replacement of letters of support with short letters of collaboration at
181**FORMS-J implementation in FY2027**. It is not a blanket instruction to relabel
182FORMS-I attachments now. Confirm the implementation date and assigned form package;
183when effective, the notice limits each collaboration letter to 100 words and removes
184endorsements. Career/training commitments and confidential reference letters have
185distinct instructions.

Submission and deadlines

Use the NOFO's Key Dates and current standard-date table. For example, standard new R01 dates are February/June/October 5; R01 A1 dates differ. NIH no longer uses dedicated AIDS deadlines after the 2026 transition. Dates are normally 5 p.m. applicant-organization local time; check weekends, federal holidays, late-submission rules and any emergency notices. Do not infer eligibility for late or continuous submission from old service history.

ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace, and supported institutional system-to-system software are preparation/submission options. ASSIST routes through Grants.gov; eRA Commons is used to track receipt, errors and the assembled application, not an alternative public submission API. Confirm UEI/SAM, Grants.gov, organization/PI Commons accounts, affiliation and authorized signing roles well in advance. Do not assume registration will finish within a fixed number of days. Review validation errors and the assembled application within the applicable viewing/correction window.

NOT-OD-26-094 announces replacement of letters of support with short letters of collaboration at FORMS-J implementation in FY2027. It is not a blanket instruction to relabel FORMS-I attachments now. Confirm the implementation date and assigned form package; when effective, the notice limits each collaboration letter to 100 words and removes endorsements. Career/training commitments and confidential reference letters have distinct instructions.

Raw lines 161 to 186
187## Resubmission and feedback
189NIH permits one A1 within 37 months of the initial application due date when the NOFO
190accepts resubmissions. Follow the [resubmission policy](https://grants.nih.gov/grants-process/submit/submission-policies/resubmission-applications),
191including waiting for the summary statement and restrictions on overlapping review.
192A subsequent new A0 is not an unrestricted right to simultaneous duplicate submission.
194For a standard research A1, use an introduction of up to one page responding to major
195criticisms, then implement the changes throughout the application. Use exact final
196section/page references and explain disagreements with evidence. Do not mark changes
197by bolding, brackets, shading or track changes solely to identify revisions. Recheck
198limits for other application types. Decide what to revise from reviewer concerns and
199program fit, not invented score bands or historical payline predictions.

Resubmission and feedback

NIH permits one A1 within 37 months of the initial application due date when the NOFO accepts resubmissions. Follow the resubmission policy, including waiting for the summary statement and restrictions on overlapping review. A subsequent new A0 is not an unrestricted right to simultaneous duplicate submission.

For a standard research A1, use an introduction of up to one page responding to major criticisms, then implement the changes throughout the application. Use exact final section/page references and explain disagreements with evidence. Do not mark changes by bolding, brackets, shading or track changes solely to identify revisions. Recheck limits for other application types. Decide what to revise from reviewer concerns and program fit, not invented score bands or historical payline predictions.

Raw lines 187 to 199