Skill Tracer
Skills › Scientific Agent Skills › clinical-reports › safety_reporting.md

safety_reporting.md

113 lines · skills/clinical-reports/references/safety_reporting.md at 5f2bc03

Open on GitHub
1# Safety Reporting Boundaries
2
3Safety reporting is role-, product-, phase-, source-, jurisdiction-, and time-dependent. This skill formats verified aggregate counts only. It does not determine seriousness, severity, causality, expectedness, reportability, clock start, destination, format, or follow-up.
4

Safety Reporting Boundaries

Safety reporting is role-, product-, phase-, source-, jurisdiction-, and time-dependent. This skill formats verified aggregate counts only. It does not determine seriousness, severity, causality, expectedness, reportability, clock start, destination, format, or follow-up.

Raw lines 1 to 4
5## Core distinctions
6
7- **Adverse event (AE)**: an untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with a medicinal product; causality is not required.
8- **Adverse reaction / suspected adverse reaction**: a causal relationship is at least reasonably possible or otherwise meets the applicable regional definition.
9- **Seriousness**: outcome or regulatory criterion such as death, life-threatening experience at the time, hospitalization, disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or another medically important event.
10- **Severity**: intensity. A severe event is not automatically serious; a serious event need not be severe in intensity.
11- **Expectedness**: comparison with the applicable reference safety information under the governing procedure.
13Only an authorized qualified safety professional may make or approve these assessments.

Core distinctions

  • Adverse event (AE): an untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with a medicinal product; causality is not required.
  • Adverse reaction / suspected adverse reaction: a causal relationship is at least reasonably possible or otherwise meets the applicable regional definition.
  • Seriousness: outcome or regulatory criterion such as death, life-threatening experience at the time, hospitalization, disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or another medically important event.
  • Severity: intensity. A severe event is not automatically serious; a serious event need not be severe in intensity.
  • Expectedness: comparison with the applicable reference safety information under the governing procedure.

Only an authorized qualified safety professional may make or approve these assessments.

Raw lines 5 to 14
15## ICH routes
17### E2A — pre-approval expedited reporting
19ICH E2A (Step 4, 27 October 1994) defines standards for expedited reporting during clinical development. It describes minimum information for an initial report and the distinction among serious, unexpected, and suspected reactions.
21Do not apply E2A as a universal post-approval rule or encode its timelines without the current regional requirement and sponsor procedure.

E2A — pre-approval expedited reporting

ICH E2A (Step 4, 27 October 1994) defines standards for expedited reporting during clinical development. It describes minimum information for an initial report and the distinction among serious, unexpected, and suspected reactions.

Do not apply E2A as a universal post-approval rule or encode its timelines without the current regional requirement and sponsor procedure.

Raw lines 17 to 22
23### E2B(R3) — ICSR electronic data and message specification
25E2B(R3) defines data elements and electronic transmission for individual case safety reports. It covers pre- and post-approval ICSRs within scope. It does not:
27- decide whether a case is reportable;
28- define an aggregate safety table;
29- replace E2A, E2D(R1), or regional rules;
30- validate clinical coding or narrative accuracy.
32Use the current implementation guide, Q&As, code lists, regional implementation guide, and receiving-system rules. The ICH catalogue did not expose a readable current file list during this review; the FDA implementation page independently confirms the E2B(R3) message specification and regional additions. No local script implements or validates E2B messages.

E2B(R3) — ICSR electronic data and message specification

E2B(R3) defines data elements and electronic transmission for individual case safety reports. It covers pre- and post-approval ICSRs within scope. It does not:

  • decide whether a case is reportable;
  • define an aggregate safety table;
  • replace E2A, E2D(R1), or regional rules;
  • validate clinical coding or narrative accuracy.

Use the current implementation guide, Q&As, code lists, regional implementation guide, and receiving-system rules. The ICH catalogue did not expose a readable current file list during this review; the FDA implementation page independently confirms the E2B(R3) message specification and regional additions. No local script implements or validates E2B messages.

Raw lines 23 to 33
34### E2D(R1) — post-approval individual cases
36ICH adopted E2D(R1), **Post-Approval Safety Data: Definitions and Standards for Management and Reporting of Individual Case Safety Reports**, on 15 September 2025.
38It addresses post-approval ICSR sources and case management, including organized data collection systems, literature, digital platforms, and patient-support programs. It explicitly directs users to:
40- E2B for ICSR structure/format/data elements;
41- E2C for periodic aggregate safety reporting;
42- regional/local requirements where they differ.
44Do not use the aggregate formatter for an ICSR or use E2D(R1) to invent missing case data.

E2D(R1) — post-approval individual cases

ICH adopted E2D(R1), Post-Approval Safety Data: Definitions and Standards for Management and Reporting of Individual Case Safety Reports, on 15 September 2025.

It addresses post-approval ICSR sources and case management, including organized data collection systems, literature, digital platforms, and patient-support programs. It explicitly directs users to:

  • E2B for ICSR structure/format/data elements;
  • E2C for periodic aggregate safety reporting;
  • regional/local requirements where they differ.

Do not use the aggregate formatter for an ICSR or use E2D(R1) to invent missing case data.

Raw lines 34 to 45
46### E2C(R2) — periodic aggregate reporting
48Where applicable, E2C(R2) addresses periodic benefit-risk evaluation reporting. Applicability and regional format require qualified review. Aggregate tables in this skill are display aids, not periodic reports.

E2C(R2) — periodic aggregate reporting

Where applicable, E2C(R2) addresses periodic benefit-risk evaluation reporting. Applicability and regional format require qualified review. Aggregate tables in this skill are display aids, not periodic reports.

Raw lines 46 to 49
50## FDA IND safety reporting
52For applicable US IND studies, 21 CFR 312.32 controls sponsor IND safety reporting. FDA issued final sponsor and investigator safety-reporting guidances in December 2025. The sponsor guidance includes aggregate-data assessment considerations; the investigator guidance clarifies investigator-to-sponsor and IRB responsibilities.
54FDA’s IND safety-reporting page, checked 30 September 2026, states:
56- sponsors report qualifying potential serious risks under 21 CFR 312.32;
57- unexpected fatal or life-threatening suspected adverse reactions must be reported to FDA as soon as possible and within 7 calendar days after the sponsor’s initial receipt of the information;
58- other qualifying potential serious risks must be reported to FDA and participating investigators as soon as possible and within 15 calendar days after the sponsor determines the information qualifies;
59- as of 1 April 2026, commercial IND reports under 21 CFR 312.32(c)(1)(i) use FDA AEMS with E2B(R3), with stated exemptions for noncommercial INDs;
60- other categories described on the page use the applicable eCTD route.
62This summary is not a reporting clock or filing instruction. The responsible sponsor, investigator, IRB/IEC, and regulatory professionals must consult the current regulation, guidance, protocol, and procedures for each event.

FDA IND safety reporting

For applicable US IND studies, 21 CFR 312.32 controls sponsor IND safety reporting. FDA issued final sponsor and investigator safety-reporting guidances in December 2025. The sponsor guidance includes aggregate-data assessment considerations; the investigator guidance clarifies investigator-to-sponsor and IRB responsibilities.

FDA’s IND safety-reporting page, checked 30 September 2026, states:

  • sponsors report qualifying potential serious risks under 21 CFR 312.32;
  • unexpected fatal or life-threatening suspected adverse reactions must be reported to FDA as soon as possible and within 7 calendar days after the sponsor’s initial receipt of the information;
  • other qualifying potential serious risks must be reported to FDA and participating investigators as soon as possible and within 15 calendar days after the sponsor determines the information qualifies;
  • as of 1 April 2026, commercial IND reports under 21 CFR 312.32(c)(1)(i) use FDA AEMS with E2B(R3), with stated exemptions for noncommercial INDs;
  • other categories described on the page use the applicable eCTD route.

This summary is not a reporting clock or filing instruction. The responsible sponsor, investigator, IRB/IEC, and regulatory professionals must consult the current regulation, guidance, protocol, and procedures for each event.

Raw lines 50 to 63
64## US postmarketing electronic transition
66FDA’s AEMS electronic-submissions page permits E2B(R2) postmarketing ICSRs through **30 September 2026** and requires E2B(R3) for all ICSRs submitted through ESG NextGen beginning **1 October 2026**. This transition is distinct from the commercial IND requirement above. FDA states that Safety Reporting Portal users need take no action for this transition. These are US receiving-system requirements, not worldwide ICH effective dates. The responsible regulatory professional must verify the applicable route; this skill never transmits.

US postmarketing electronic transition

FDA’s AEMS electronic-submissions page permits E2B(R2) postmarketing ICSRs through 30 September 2026 and requires E2B(R3) for all ICSRs submitted through ESG NextGen beginning 1 October 2026. This transition is distinct from the commercial IND requirement above. FDA states that Safety Reporting Portal users need take no action for this transition. These are US receiving-system requirements, not worldwide ICH effective dates. The responsible regulatory professional must verify the applicable route; this skill never transmits.

Raw lines 64 to 67
68## Aggregate formatter input
70`format_adverse_events.py` accepts only aggregate rows:
72- analysis set;
73- treatment group;
74- MedDRA version;
75- system organ class;
76- preferred term;
77- subjects affected;
78- event count;
79- denominator.
81It also requires a populated `clinical_trial_safety_aggregate_template.json` sidecar
82that records authorization, protocol/SAP/data-cut references, analysis set, counting
83and threshold rules, MedDRA version/language, provenance, and pending human reviews.
85It rejects row-level identifiers, verbatim narratives, case IDs, and onset dates. It checks arithmetic and group consistency but does not verify:
87- MedDRA term/code validity;
88- coding quality or hierarchy placement;
89- treatment relatedness;
90- seriousness or fatality;
91- analysis-set correctness;
92- deduplication;
93- whether a subject appears in multiple terms or SOCs;
94- statistical inference.

Aggregate formatter input

format_adverse_events.py accepts only aggregate rows:

  • analysis set;
  • treatment group;
  • MedDRA version;
  • system organ class;
  • preferred term;
  • subjects affected;
  • event count;
  • denominator.

It also requires a populated clinical_trial_safety_aggregate_template.json sidecar that records authorization, protocol/SAP/data-cut references, analysis set, counting and threshold rules, MedDRA version/language, provenance, and pending human reviews.

It rejects row-level identifiers, verbatim narratives, case IDs, and onset dates. It checks arithmetic and group consistency but does not verify:

  • MedDRA term/code validity;
  • coding quality or hierarchy placement;
  • treatment relatedness;
  • seriousness or fatality;
  • analysis-set correctness;
  • deduplication;
  • whether a subject appears in multiple terms or SOCs;
  • statistical inference.
Raw lines 68 to 95
96## MedDRA caveats
98MedDRA 29.1 (September 2026) is the released version documented by the official English Introductory Guide at this review. A report must use the study/sponsor-authorized dictionary version, not automatically the newest version.
100State the exact version and language. Terms can change currency, names, or hierarchy across releases; codes can persist through renames. Use licensed official files and MedDRA Points to Consider. A syntax checker cannot validate coding.

MedDRA caveats

MedDRA 29.1 (September 2026) is the released version documented by the official English Introductory Guide at this review. A report must use the study/sponsor-authorized dictionary version, not automatically the newest version.

State the exact version and language. Terms can change currency, names, or hierarchy across releases; codes can persist through renames. Use licensed official files and MedDRA Points to Consider. A syntax checker cannot validate coding.

Raw lines 96 to 101
102## Required handoff
104Every aggregate table must disclose:
106- analysis set and denominator per group;
107- whether values are subjects, events, or both;
108- MedDRA version and language;
109- counting rules and threshold supplied by the protocol/SAP;
110- missing or suppressed cells;
111- no inferential claim unless separately verified;
112- qualified safety and statistical review required;
113- not suitable for individual-case submission.

Required handoff

Every aggregate table must disclose:

  • analysis set and denominator per group;
  • whether values are subjects, events, or both;
  • MedDRA version and language;
  • counting rules and threshold supplied by the protocol/SAP;
  • missing or suppressed cells;
  • no inferential claim unless separately verified;
  • qualified safety and statistical review required;
  • not suitable for individual-case submission.
Raw lines 102 to 113