autoplan
The facts
Its description
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack) Triggers: run all reviews; automatic review pipeline; auto plan review
The description the agent reads to decide when to use it. Phrases the author says should start it.
When it starts
The agent picks this when someone wants the whole plan-review pipeline (CEO, design, eng and DX reviews) run in one pass, with the agent auto-deciding the intermediate questions instead of stopping to ask at each one.
Things a person might say (the model's guesses)
- “Run all the reviews on this plan.”
- “Auto plan review this branch.”
- “Run the full review pipeline on my plan and just make the calls yourself.”
A model's summary of when it is used.
Tools it may use, or may not
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
Tools it may use while it runs without asking you first.
Starts other agents
15 lines mention starting other agents (first 5 linked)
Lines in the file that mention starting another agent. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.
Runs scripts
bin/gstack-skill-start, scripts/question-registry.ts, bin/gstack-question-preference, bin/gstack-question-log, bin/gstack-paths (first 5 of 30 lines)
Scripts the text names. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.
Files it mentions
sections/ceo-phase.md, sections/design-phase.md, sections/eng-phase.md, sections/dx-phase.md, sections/phase-close.md (first 5 of 8 lines)
Files the text names, such as ones to read or write. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.
Stops for a person
8 lines stop to ask a person (first 5 linked)
Lines that stop and wait for a person before going on. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.
Runs automatically at certain moments
Runs commands automatically at set moments
Hooks run commands at moments such as before a tool is used. The linked line shows them as written.
What it leads to
- hands off to ship after the plan is approved line 728
- calls plan-ceo-review line 461
- calls plan-design-review only if UI scope was detected line 462
- calls plan-devex-review only if DX scope was detected line 463
- calls plan-eng-review line 464
- requires office-hours only when no design doc is found and the user accepts line 220
Other skills this one hands off to, calls, requires or offers instead, as a model read them.
What leads to it
- gstack hands off to this PROACTIVE all, or user names it gstack, line 201
- spec hands off to this for the full review gauntlet spec, line 626
- land-and-deploy requires this when reviews are stale land-and-deploy/readiness-gate.md, line 300
Other skills that hand off to this one, call it, require it or offer it instead, as a model read them.
What leads to it
- captain hands off to this captain, line 371
Other skills that hand off to this one, call it, require it or offer it instead, found by matching their names, so treat them as pointers.
Licence
MIT, from LICENSE
The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.
Other files in this skill (16) Close
- DRIVER.md
- bin/guard-journal.ts
- bin/guard-log.ts
- bin/guard-reasons.ts
- bin/owned-read.ts
- bin/phase-publication-hook
- bin/phase-publication-hook.ts
- sections/ceo-phase.md
- sections/design-phase.md
- sections/dx-phase.md
- sections/eng-phase.md
- sections/manifest.json
- sections/phase-close.md
- sections/preamble.md
- sections/tasks-aggregator.md
- sections/unattended.md
The text
Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly --> <!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->
Raw lines 1 to 34Boilerplate, lines 35 to 142. The same text appears in 45 other files here. Close
Step 0: Detect platform and base branch
First, detect the git hosting platform from the remote URL:
git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null- If the URL contains "github.com" → platform is GitHub
- If the URL contains "gitlab" → platform is GitLab
- Otherwise, check CLI availability:
gh auth status 2>/dev/nullsucceeds → platform is GitHub (covers GitHub Enterprise)glab auth status 2>/dev/nullsucceeds → platform is GitLab (covers self-hosted)- Neither → unknown (use git-native commands only)
Determine which branch this PR/MR targets, or the repo's default branch if no PR/MR exists. Use the result as "the base branch" in all subsequent steps.
If GitHub:
gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName— if succeeds, use itgh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name— if succeeds, use it
If GitLab:
glab mr view -F json 2>/dev/nulland extract thetarget_branchfield — if succeeds, use itglab repo view -F json 2>/dev/nulland extract thedefault_branchfield — if succeeds, use it
Git-native fallback (if unknown platform, or CLI commands fail):
git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'- If that fails:
git rev-parse --verify origin/main 2>/dev/null→ usemain - If that fails:
git rev-parse --verify origin/master 2>/dev/null→ usemaster
If all fail, fall back to main.
Print the detected base branch name. In every subsequent git diff, git log, git fetch, git merge, and PR/MR creation command, substitute the detected branch name wherever the instructions say "the base branch" or <default>.
Raw lines 143 to 181
Design Doc Check
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true # zsh compat
SLUG=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/bin/remote-slug 2>/dev/null || basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)")
BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null | tr '/' '-' || echo 'no-branch')
DESIGN=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-design-doc-find "$SLUG" "$BRANCH")
[ -n "$DESIGN" ] && echo "Design doc found: $DESIGN" || echo "No design doc found"If a design doc exists, read it; its problem statement, constraints and chosen approach feed the pipeline.
Raw lines 182 to 193Prerequisite Skill Offer
When the design doc check above prints "No design doc found," offer the prerequisite skill before proceeding.
Skip the offer and proceed with the standard review when the preamble echoed SESSION_KIND spawned or headless.
Say to the user via AskUserQuestion:
"No design doc found for this branch. /office-hours produces a structured problem statement, premise challenge, and explored alternatives — it gives this review much sharper input to work with. Takes about 10 minutes. The design doc is per-feature, not per-product — it captures the thinking behind this specific change."Options:
- A) Run /office-hours now (we'll pick up the review right after)
- B) Skip — proceed with standard review
If they skip: "No worries — standard review. If you ever want sharper input, try /office-hours first next time." Then proceed normally. Do not re-offer later in the session.
If they choose A:
Say: "Running /office-hours inline. Once the design doc is ready, I'll pick up the review right where we left off."
Read the /office-hours skill file at ~/.claude/skills/gstack/office-hours/SKILL.md using the Read tool.
If unreadable: Skip with "Could not load /office-hours — skipping." and continue.
Follow its instructions from top to bottom, skipping these sections when present (already handled by the parent skill):
- Preamble (run first)
- AskUserQuestion Format
- Shared preamble (load first)
- Search Before Building
- Contributor Mode
- Telemetry (run last)
- Step 0: Detect platform and base branch
- Review Readiness Dashboard
- Plan File Review Report
- Prerequisite Skill Offer
- Plan Status Footer
Execute every other section at full depth. When the loaded skill's instructions are complete, continue with the next step below.
After /office-hours completes, re-run the design doc check:
setopt +o nomatch 2>/dev/null || true # zsh compat
SLUG=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/browse/bin/remote-slug 2>/dev/null || basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)")
BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null | tr '/' '-' || echo 'no-branch')
DESIGN=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-design-doc-find "$SLUG" "$BRANCH")
[ -n "$DESIGN" ] && echo "Design doc found: $DESIGN" || echo "No design doc found"If a design doc is now found, read it and continue the review. If none was produced (user may have cancelled), proceed with standard review.
/autoplan — Auto-Review Pipeline
Read every CEO, design, DX and eng section from disk at full interactive depth. The 6 principles answer intermediate questions; taste goes to one final gate.
Raw lines 194 to 257
Section index — Read each section when its situation applies
This skill is a decision-tree skeleton. The steps below point to on-demand sections. Read a section in full before doing its step; do not work from memory.
| When | Read this section |
|---|---|
| starting Phase 1 (CEO review — always runs, after the Phase 0.5 preflight) | sections/ceo-phase.md |
| starting Phase 2 (design review — ONLY if UI scope was detected in Phase 0; skip the read entirely otherwise) | sections/design-phase.md |
| starting Phase 3 (eng review — always runs, after all earlier applicable phases have closed) | sections/eng-phase.md |
| starting Phase 2.5 (DX review — ONLY if developer-facing scope was detected in Phase 0; skip the read entirely otherwise) | sections/dx-phase.md |
| closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit) | sections/phase-close.md |
| presenting the Final Approval Gate (Phase 4) — the aggregator computes $AGGREGATED_TASKS that the gate message substitutes | sections/tasks-aggregator.md |
the preamble echoed SESSION_KIND: unattended (read before Phase 1 and at the Phase 4 gate) | sections/unattended.md |
Raw lines 258 to 274
The 6 Decision Principles
- Choose completeness — Ship the whole thing; pick the approach covering more edge cases.
- Boil lakes — Fix everything in the blast radius (files this plan modifies + direct importers). Auto-approve expansions in blast radius AND < 1 day CC effort (< 5 files, no new infra).
- Pragmatic — Two options fix the same thing? Pick the cleaner one, in seconds.
- DRY — Duplicates existing functionality? Reject; reuse what exists.
- Explicit over clever — 10-line obvious fix > 200-line abstraction; pick what a new contributor reads at a glance.
- Bias toward action — Merge > review cycles > stale deliberation. Flag concerns, don't block.
Conflict resolution (context-dependent tiebreakers):
- CEO phase: P1 (completeness) + P2 (boil lakes) dominate.
- Eng phase: P5 (explicit) + P3 (pragmatic) dominate.
- Design phase: P5 (explicit) + P1 (completeness) dominate.
Raw lines 275 to 290
Decision Classification
Every auto-decision is classified:
Mechanical — one clearly right answer. Auto-decide silently (run the enabled outside reviewer: yes; run evals: yes; reduce scope on a complete plan: no).
Taste — reasonable people could disagree. Auto-decide with a recommendation; surface at the final gate. Sources:
- Close approaches — top two are both viable with different tradeoffs.
- Borderline scope — in blast radius but 3-5 files, or ambiguous radius.
- Codex disagreements — the outside reviewer recommends differently and has a valid point.
User Challenge — Claude and Codex both recommend changing the user's stated direction: merge, split, add or remove features/skills/workflows. NEVER auto-decide these. At the final approval gate give the original direction, proposed change, reasoning, blind spots and cost of being wrong (Phase 4 gate item); flag agreed security/feasibility risks. The user's direction stands until they approve the change.
Raw lines 291 to 310
Sequential Execution — MANDATORY
Phases MUST run in strict order: CEO → Design (if UI scope) → DX (if developer-facing scope) → Eng. Eng runs LAST, always, reviewing all prior amendments. Keep ONE phase active, completing these gates in order:
- Load its phase instructions and full skill/sections, recording complete Read ranges. On Claude Code, enter through a native
Readof the installed phase driver, then use nativeReadfor its methodology ranges. The driver Read is the guarded entrypoint. If denied, finish or repair the preceding phase and retry the same Read; changing file-loading tools does not satisfy the boundary. - Complete the phase's required preliminary work (CEO: all Step 0, including its Spec Review Loop and its amendment checkpoint), then create the fresh snapshot and dispatch its nativeDispatchPrompt unchanged.
- Consume the native terminal result and apply the phase's failure policy, then consume enabled outside results. Complete the phase's remaining primary review sections after these results.
- At the phase's exit, load its
phase-closesection afresh. Execute its numbered operations: prepare the current packet, Read it completely, reconcile it semantically, then SEND the parent completion message. Publication is its own operation; an earlier Read is not this close. - Only after the message has been sent may the driver load/create/dispatch the next phase. Then continue to the next phase's tool calls in the same turn; after Eng, proceed to final synthesis/approval. Use the declared skip rule for an inapplicable phase; do not load its review or close steps.
Phase notifications, skips included, are progress updates: never end the turn or wait for a "continue" reply there. A missing gate keeps the current phase open, even if a reviewer finished. Read requests/self-reports and INPUT hashes do not prove uptake or review quality. Never draft future-phase reviews or outputs. Headings/promises are not completion. After compaction, reload current phase instructions/skill/sections, then reconcile saved artifacts and sent conversation messages separately. If closing, reload phase-close and resume its first incomplete numbered operation; regenerate and reread the full packet when the implementation or accepted decisions changed:
- If a verified phase lacks its announcement, resume the close procedure at step 6 (Publish) before advancing.
- If its reviewer is pending, wait for that same reviewer.
- If native dispatch has not happened, finish any incomplete preliminary work before recovering a voice input. If the final voice input does not exist, create it after the preliminary gates. Read
snapshot.jsonbeside that final<PHASE_INPUT>and use itsnativeDispatchPromptunchanged. Never dispatch<CEO_STEP0_CHECKPOINT>: it is the stable amendment baseline, not current review input.nativePromptis the file's review body, not the Agent prompt. Resume at the first incomplete gate.
Pending is not unavailable. Never skip native passes/required sections for time, context pressure or your own review. Missing outside coverage never blocks native completion; report accurately. Never read raw agent transcripts.
Raw lines 311 to 357
What "Auto-Decide" Means
Auto-decide replaces the USER'S answer, not ANALYSIS. Run each loaded section at full interactive depth; answer each question using the 6 principles.
Default resolution: the recommended option. Take (recommended) or the mode's context default. Use the 6 principles for missing recommendations/ties. On principle disagreement, take the recommendation and surface it as Taste at the final gate.
Never auto-decide User Challenges: both models agree to change the user's direction/settled decisions, or a premise is clearly wrong. Ask once at the Final Approval Gate, never mid-run; the user has context models lack.
Read referenced code/diffs/files; decide every issue. Produce all required diagrams, tables, registries and artifacts on disk or in the plan. LOG decisions, record ALL accepted obligations below and run amend-input before continuing. Missing deliverables leave the review incomplete.
No summary substitutes or one-line sections; under 3 sentences likely means compression. "No issues found" needs 1-2 sentences on what was examined and why. Explain inapplicability with evidence; skip only under Phase 0's list. Never abort or redirect to interactive review: the user chose /autoplan.
Accepted obligations: One unfenced block per phase in Review record:
<!-- autoplan-accepted:ceo -->
- Requirement, all conditions and verification/tests.
<!-- /autoplan-accepted:ceo -->Phase: ceo|design|dx|eng. Record accepted requirements here; no analysis/severity/verdict/consensus. None accepted: None: reason. On a rerun, carry forward unchanged accepted requirements; never replace them with None. amend checks exact retention atomically; full readback; None unchanged. Baseline edits: create's baselineEdits. Prior blocks immutable; state replacements in current block. Reconcile all decisions with readback. Transport ≠ approval/complete enumeration/correctness.
Raw lines 358 to 396
Filesystem Boundary — Codex Prompts
Prefix every Codex prompt:
IMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.
Raw lines 397 to 404
Phase 0: Intake + Restore Point
Raw lines 405 to 406Step 1: Capture restore point
Absolute paths: SOURCE_PLAN (input), ACTIVE_PLAN (harness-assigned plan, else SOURCE_PLAN). Save plan amendments and review artifacts to ACTIVE_PLAN. Send phase announcements and the final approval request (the brief) in the conversation. Resolve SNAPSHOT_TOOL once:
bun --no-env-file --config=/dev/null -e 'console.log(require("fs").realpathSync(process.argv[1]))' "$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-autoplan-snapshot.ts"Fresh RESTORE_PATH, beside its phase artifacts in the git-excluded .gstack/tmp/autoplan/:
SLUG=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug --get SLUG 2>/dev/null)
_AP="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)/.gstack/tmp/autoplan"; mkdir -p "$_AP" && chmod 700 "$_AP"
_EX=$(git rev-parse --git-path info/exclude 2>/dev/null) && mkdir -p "${_EX%/*}" && { grep -qxF /.gstack/tmp/ "$_EX" 2>/dev/null || echo /.gstack/tmp/ >> "$_EX"; }
BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null | tr '/' '-')
DATETIME=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
echo "SLUG=$SLUG"
echo "RESTORE_PATH=$_AP/${BRANCH}-autoplan-restore-${DATETIME}.md"
echo "RUN_ID=${BRANCH}-${DATETIME}"; ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-autoplan-timing estimate --run "${BRANCH}-${DATETIME}" --out "$_AP"Before scope/review:
bun "<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>" init "<SOURCE_PLAN>" "<ACTIVE_PLAN>" "<RESTORE_PATH>"Run init as its own Bash call with literal absolute paths: no variables, substitutions, chaining, pipes or redirects, which the guard cannot bind. Use returned paths/scope; never hand-wrap. init backs up SOURCE_PLAN exactly, then initializes ACTIVE_PLAN atomically, keeping every requirement. Reviewers get only ## Implementation plan; analysis, structured inputs included, stays in ## Review record. On helper errors, stop; no stderr hiding/grep fallback. Re-run: copy RESTORE_PATH's bytes to SOURCE_PLAN, then /autoplan.
Step 2: Read context
- Read CLAUDE.md, TODOS.md, git log -30, git diff against the base branch --stat
- Discover design docs:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-design-doc-find "$SLUG" "$BRANCH"(prints the doc path, or nothing) - Use init's full-input
scope. For changed input or semantic enabling flags, rerun:
bun "<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>" scope "<ACTIVE_PLAN>"UI scope is returned uiRequired: a rendered file path or a UI term next to a visual noun (uiEvidence); bare UI words never add Design. Use returned dxRequired (initially scope.dxRequired); record its input hash and matched terms. The threshold is 2+ term matches (occurrences, not distinct terms). Also enable DX when the product is a developer tool (developers install, integrate or build on it) or an AI agent is the primary user: add --developer-tool or --agent-primary. These flags only enable DX; no context label negates a positive result. Skip DX only when both are false.
Step 3: Locate review skills; load each at phase entry
Resolve this phase's source to absolute <REVIEW_SKILL>; load via its checkpoint:
- Phase 1:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md - Phase 2:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-design-review/SKILL.md(only if UI scope detected) - Phase 2.5:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-devex-review/SKILL.md(only if DX scope detected) - Phase 3:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-eng-review/SKILL.md
Use /autoplan's installed registry; resolve siblings from its discovered SKILL.md directory, never cwd/runtime assets. Missing skill: report the phase and setup repair; never substitute a harness or claim completion.
Read skills/sections only at their triggers, never prefetch future phases. Load the tasks aggregator at Phase 4. Run every applicable skill and lazy section fully.
Section skip list — when following a loaded skill file, SKIP these sections (they are already handled by /autoplan):
- Preamble (run first)
- Scope gate (the plan under review is already the target)
- AskUserQuestion Format
- Shared preamble (load first)
- Search Before Building
- Telemetry (run last)
- Step 0: Detect platform and base branch
- Review Readiness Dashboard
- Plan File Review Report
- Prerequisite Skill Offer (BENEFITS_FROM)
- Outside Voice — Independent Plan Challenge
- Design Outside Voices (independent)
Follow ONLY the review-specific methodology, sections and required outputs.
Output: "Here's what I'm working with: [plan summary]. UI scope: [yes/no]. DX scope: [yes/no]. Review skills load at each phase entry; starting the full pipeline with auto-decisions."
Raw lines 458 to 494
Phase 0.5: Outside reviewer preflight
# Codex preflight: the probe runs as a command, so any shell works.
_CODEX_PROBE=~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe
_CODEX_CFG=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get --stored codex_reviews 2>/dev/null)
_gstack_helper_error=""
[ -x "$_CODEX_PROBE" ] || _gstack_helper_error="gstack: cannot load gstack-codex-probe; re-run ./setup. https://github.com/garrytan/gstack/blob/main/docs/troubleshooting.md#sourced-helper-location"
if [ "$_CODEX_CFG" = "disabled" ] || [ "$_CODEX_CFG" = "unreadable" ]; then
_CODEX_MODE="disabled"
elif { [ -n "${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}" ] || [ -n "${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}" ] || [ "${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}" = codex ]; }; then
_CODEX_MODE="under_codex"
elif ! command -v codex >/dev/null 2>&1; then
_CODEX_MODE="not_installed"; "$_CODEX_PROBE" log-event codex_cli_missing 2>/dev/null || true
elif [ -n "$_gstack_helper_error" ]; then
_CODEX_MODE="helper_unavailable"; echo "$_gstack_helper_error"
elif ! "$_CODEX_PROBE" check-auth >/dev/null 2>&1; then
_CODEX_MODE="not_authed"; "$_CODEX_PROBE" log-event codex_auth_failed 2>/dev/null || true
else
_CODEX_MP=0
"$_CODEX_PROBE" check-sandbox || _CODEX_MP=3
if [ "$_CODEX_MP" -eq 3 ]; then
_CODEX_MODE="sandbox_unavailable"
else
_CODEX_MODE="ready"; "$_CODEX_PROBE" check-version || true
fi
fi
echo "CODEX_MODE: $_CODEX_MODE"Branch on the echoed CODEX_MODE:
- **
disabled** (or a send'sconsent_missingline) —codex_reviewsis off or unreadable. Skip the Codex passes only; the Claude adversarial subagent below STILL runs (it is free and fast). Print: "Codex passes skipped (codex_reviews disabled) — running Claude adversarial only." - **
helper_unavailable** — the probe is missing or not executable; relay the line above (cause and fix). Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
not_installed** — Codex CLI absent. Print: "Codex not installed; outside coverage unavailable. Install:npm install -g @openai/codex." Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
under_codex** — stale artifact selected its own harness. Print: "Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage. Repair: setup --host codex." Skip the outside invocation and follow the workflow's native-review instructions below. Conflicting inherited harness markers are not grounds to guess another provider. - **
not_authed** — installed but no credentials. Print: "Codex not authenticated; outside coverage unavailable. Runcodex loginor set$CODEX_API_KEY." Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
broken_install** — the CLI is on PATH but cannot execute (spawn ENOENT, non-executable binary, missing vendor payload). Print: "Codex is installed but its binary cannot run — Codex passes skipped. Reinstall:npm install -g @openai/codex." Relay the probe's HINT lines. Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
model_unusable** — the role invocation rejected policy, auth or model selection. Relay its reason and source-specific Repair/HINT lines, not a lower-priority setting.AUTH_FAILEDneedscodex login; never substitute a model. Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
quota_exhausted** — Codex usage limit: relay the probe's lines verbatim (reset time, retry); no more Codex calls this run. Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
sandbox_unavailable** — Codex's sandbox cannot start here (containers without user namespaces); the probe printed the reason and fix. No paid call ran; outside coverage is unavailable. Keep the required Claude adversarial pass; do not dispatch a duplicate. - **
readyorunverified** — run the Codex pass below.unverifiedmeans the model check timed out or, with(rate_limited), hit a 429; say so, and let the pass's own verdict decide.
Plan-review readiness probes the policy model. Relay its diagnostics; never infer quota from the review block's exit status.
Disabled/unavailable retains applicable native passes. Recheck each outside dispatch. Record provider and completed/unavailable/disabled/skipped per phase (CEO covers only CEO). Missing voices: N/A, never CONFIRMED. Skipped scope stays skipped.
Raw lines 495 to 543Phase 1: CEO Review (Strategy & Scope)
STOP. Before starting Phase 1 (CEO review — always runs, after the Phase 0.5 preflight), Read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/ceo-phase.md and execute it in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.Raw lines 544 to 550
Phase 2: Design Review (conditional — skip if no UI scope)
Skip condition: No UI scope detected in Phase 0: skip this phase entirely — do NOT read its section. Send: "Phase 2 skipped — no UI scope detected." Record the skip in ACTIVE_PLAN; it is not a completed review.
STOP. Before starting Phase 2 (design review — ONLY if UI scope was detected in Phase 0; skip the read entirely otherwise), Read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md and execute it in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.Raw lines 551 to 561
Phase 2.5: DX Review (conditional — skip if no developer-facing scope)
Skip condition: No DX scope detected in Phase 0: skip this phase entirely — do NOT read its section. Send: "Phase 2.5 skipped — no developer-facing scope detected." Record the skip in ACTIVE_PLAN; it is not a completed review.
STOP. Before starting Phase 2.5 (DX review — ONLY if developer-facing scope was detected in Phase 0; skip the read entirely otherwise), Read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/dx-phase.md and execute it in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.Raw lines 562 to 572
Phase 3: Eng Review + Dual Voices (always runs, always LAST — the required gate reviews the final amended plan)
STOP. Before starting Phase 3 (eng review — always runs, after all earlier applicable phases have closed), Read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/eng-phase.md and execute it in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.Raw lines 573 to 579
Decision Audit Trail
Right after each auto-decision, append one row to the plan file using Edit:
<!-- AUTONOMOUS DECISION LOG -->
## Decision Audit Trail
| # | Phase | Decision | Classification | Principle | Rationale | Rejected |
|---|-------|----------|----------------|-----------|-----------|----------|Raw lines 580 to 593
Pre-Gate Verification
Check the plan and conversation for each applicable deliverable:
| Phase | Required outputs |
|---|---|
| CEO | Named premise challenges (the premise table's REALITY: lines); findings or explicit examination/no-findings per applicable section; Error & Rescue and Failure Modes registries (or N/A with reason); NOT in scope; What already exists; dream state delta; Completion Summary; consensus table. |
| Design, if UI | Scores for all 7 dimensions; identified and decided issues; litmus scorecard. |
| DX, if developer-facing | Scores for all 8 dimensions; developer journey map; empathy narrative; TTHW assessment and target; DX Implementation Checklist; consensus table. |
| Eng, always last | Scope challenge grounded in code with its REALITY: lines; architecture ASCII diagram; codepath-to-test diagram; test plan on disk at ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/; NOT in scope; What already exists; failure modes registry with critical gaps; Completion Summary; consensus table. |
Per phase, verify native and outside voice results or explicit unavailable/skipped status, cross-phase themes and one Decision Audit Trail row per auto-decision. Produce missing outputs before the gate; after at most 2 repair attempts, warn there with each incomplete item.
Reality rows: each phase's PLAN_REALITY: … verdict=complete from ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-plan-reality check --phase <ceo|eng> <review-file|->. A missing applicable row is incomplete in an unattended run, never a warning; interactive runs follow the repair rule above.
Raw lines 594 to 615
Phase 4: Final Approval Gate
STOP. Before presenting the Final Approval Gate (Phase 4) — the aggregator computes $AGGREGATED_TASKS that the gate message substitutes, Read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/tasks-aggregator.md and execute it in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.STOP here and present the one-page brief to the user.
Write $_AP/gate.json (shape: gstack-gate --help): one item per User Challenge (uc<n>, approval; why = you said / both recommend / why / blind spots / cost if wrong), per taste decision (d<n>, auto; why = principle and the alternative's impact) and plan (approval: a) approve as-is (recommended) b) with overrides c) interrogate d) revise e) reject). Run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-gate render $_AP/gate.json and append its decisions output to $_AP/decisions.jsonl. Write the full review to $_AP/review-record.md and its Plan Summary alone to $_AP/summary.md:
## /autoplan Review Complete
## URGENT, outside this plan
[`~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-artifact urgent $_AP/findings.jsonl` output (security or data-loss
findings outside this plan, or `None.`); also written above `## Implementation plan` in ACTIVE_PLAN]
### Plan Summary
[1-3 sentence summary]
### Decisions Made: [N] total ([M] auto-decided, [K] taste choices, [J] user challenges)
Auto-decided: see the plan file's Decision Audit Trail; the rest are the brief's decisions.
### Review Scores
CEO, Design, DX and Eng: phase summary plus Codex, Claude
and consensus status; say skipped where a phase did not run. Then the CYCLE line
from `~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-autoplan-timing summary --run <RUN_ID> --out "$_AP"`.
### Cross-Phase Themes
Concerns independently raised in 2+ phases, or "No cross-phase themes — each phase's concerns were distinct."
### Deferred to TODOS.md
[Items auto-deferred with reasons]
### Implementation Tasks (aggregated across phases)
[Substitute $AGGREGATED_TASKS. If empty: "_No per-phase task lists found in $TASKS_DIR for branch $BRANCH._"]Present ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-owner-brief render --out "$_AP" --write verbatim (URGENT block, plain summary, numbered decisions seven per page with each auto default, review-record path; --page N for later pages), never the full review.
Parse the reply: ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-gate parse $_AP/gate.json --reply "<text>" --gate-rev <rev>; unparsed or stale replies are re-presented (gate_rev+1), never guessed. all or plana without overrides = A; d<n> overrides = B; uc<n> overrides = B2; planc/pland/plane = C/D/E. Under SESSION_KIND: unattended Read sections/unattended.md, end here with its GSTACK_RESULT line and never approve.
Option handling:
- A: mark APPROVED, run
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-owner-brief close --out "$_AP" --plan <ACTIVE_PLAN>(draft-direction lines become the decided option and date), write review logs, suggest /ship - B: ask which overrides, apply, then follow D's affected-phase rerun rule (Eng last) before re-presenting the gate; same 3-cycle cap as D.
- B2: accept/reject User Challenges one at a time; rejected ones preserve the user's direction. Re-run Eng, then re-present the gate.
- C: answer freeform, re-present the gate
- D: make changes, re-run affected phases (scope→1, design→2, dx→2.5, test plan→3, arch→3; a re-run of any earlier phase re-runs Eng after it — the gate always reviews the final plan). Max 3 cycles.
- E: start over
Starting an affected-phase rerun: Keep the current Implementation plan and all prior accepted obligations intact. Move that phase's applied autoplan-baseline-edits record verbatim into fenced history in Review record, keeping its original source SHA. Create a fresh amendment checkpoint. New baseline edits use create's baselineEdits.record and sourceSha256; the review projection hash is not baseline identity. Carry forward unchanged accepted requirements. Never replay old replacements or rewrite a historical source SHA. This is a new phase invocation; compaction resumes the existing one and its checkpoint. Eng still runs last.
Raw lines 616 to 687
Completion: Write Review Logs
On approval, log each completed review for /ship's dashboard, substituting TIMESTAMP, STATUS ("clean" or "issues_open") and N.
COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null)
TIMESTAMP=$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{"skill":"plan-ceo-review","timestamp":"'"$TIMESTAMP"'","status":"STATUS","unresolved":N,"critical_gaps":N,"mode":"SELECTIVE_EXPANSION","via":"autoplan","commit":"'"$COMMIT"'"}'
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{"skill":"plan-eng-review","timestamp":"'"$TIMESTAMP"'","status":"STATUS","unresolved":N,"critical_gaps":N,"issues_found":N,"mode":"FULL_REVIEW","via":"autoplan","commit":"'"$COMMIT"'"}'If Phase 2 ran (UI scope):
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{"skill":"plan-design-review","timestamp":"'"$TIMESTAMP"'","status":"STATUS","unresolved":N,"via":"autoplan","commit":"'"$COMMIT"'"}'If Phase 2.5 ran (DX scope):
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{"skill":"plan-devex-review","timestamp":"'"$TIMESTAMP"'","status":"STATUS","initial_score":N,"overall_score":N,"product_type":"TYPE","tthw_current":"TTHW","tthw_target":"TARGET","unresolved":N,"dx_rubric":"agent-ready-v1","via":"autoplan","commit":"'"$COMMIT"'"}'Dual voice logs: one record per PHASE (ceo, design, dx, eng) with that phase's status/counts, sharing one AUTOPLAN_RUN_ID and TIMESTAMP.
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '{"skill":"autoplan-voices","run_id":"AUTOPLAN_RUN_ID","timestamp":"'"$TIMESTAMP"'","status":"STATUS","source":"SOURCE","host":"claude","outside_provider":"codex","outside_status":"OUTSIDE_STATUS","phase":"PHASE","via":"autoplan","consensus_confirmed":N,"consensus_disagree":N,"commit":"'"$COMMIT"'"}'Always log skipped Design/DX: status/outside_status "skipped", source "none", zero consensus counts. SOURCE = "codex" only for completed external output; native results use "in-host". OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed, unavailable, disabled or skipped. Never carry success across phases/runs; preserve modelUsage.
Retain the historical review-log skill ID; add "host":"claude","outside_provider":"codex","outside_status":"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped","phase":"autoplan". Record differing attempt outcomes separately. source:"codex" requires completed CLI output; native uses source:"in-host" (historical source:"claude": native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown. Under GSTACK_CODEX_NO_SANDBOX=1 add "codex_sandbox":"danger-full-access".
Present a phase coverage table (CEO, design, DX, eng): host, outside provider/status, native completion, findings, partial coverage, with actual counts.
Implementation model: relay model/source from "$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-models" resolve --role implementation --provider anthropic. gstack cannot change this session. Recommend only; no spawn or config edits unless asked. On error, relay its repair, not a model. Policy setup.
Suggest /ship when ready to create the PR.
From garrytan/gstack at 3f79d81, 2026-11-01. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.