Skill Tracer
Skills › Knowledge Work Plugins › competitive-brief

competitive-brief

skill · 331 lines · Apache-2.0 · marketing/skills/competitive-brief/SKILL.md

The facts

Its description

Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact.

The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.

From its settingsline 3

When it starts

The agent sees only the name and description, so it would pick this skill when someone asks for competitor research or a positioning/messaging comparison — including building a sales battlecard, hunting for unclaimed positioning angles, or reacting to a competitor's recent move. The body is only reached after that match, and it is also invoked directly by the slash command.

Things a person might say (the model's guesses)

  • “Put together a competitive brief on Acme and Globex.”
  • “Our biggest competitor just dropped their prices — how does that affect our positioning?”
  • “I need a battlecard our sales team can use against Competitor X.”

A model's summary of when it is used.

A model's reading

What it takes when started

<competitor or market segment>

What to type after its name when you start it.

From its settingsline 4

What leads to it

Other skills that hand off to this one, call it, require it or offer it instead, as a model read them.

A model's reading

Licence

Apache-2.0, from marketing/LICENSE

The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.

From the repositorylicence text

The text

Open on GitHub
1---
2name: competitive-brief
3description: Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact.
4argument-hint: "<competitor or market segment>"
5---
6
7# Competitive Brief
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
11Research competitors and generate a structured competitive analysis comparing positioning, messaging, content strategy, and market presence.

Competitive Brief

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Research competitors and generate a structured competitive analysis comparing positioning, messaging, content strategy, and market presence.

Raw lines 1 to 12
13## Trigger
15User runs `/competitive-brief` or asks for a competitive analysis, competitor research, or market comparison.

Trigger

User runs /competitive-brief or asks for a competitive analysis, competitor research, or market comparison.

Raw lines 13 to 16
17## Inputs
19Gather the following from the user:
211. **Competitor name(s)** — one or more competitors to analyze (required)
232. **Your company/product context** (optional but recommended):
24 - What you sell and to whom
25 - Your positioning or value proposition
26 - Key differentiators you want to highlight
283. **Focus areas** (optional — if not specified, cover all):
29 - Messaging and positioning
30 - Product and feature comparison
31 - Content and thought leadership strategy
32 - Recent announcements and news
33 - Pricing and packaging (if publicly available)
34 - Market presence and audience

Inputs

Gather the following from the user:

  1. Competitor name(s) — one or more competitors to analyze (required)
  1. Your company/product context (optional but recommended):
  2. What you sell and to whom
  3. Your positioning or value proposition
  4. Key differentiators you want to highlight
  1. Focus areas (optional — if not specified, cover all):
  2. Messaging and positioning
  3. Product and feature comparison
  4. Content and thought leadership strategy
  5. Recent announcements and news
  6. Pricing and packaging (if publicly available)
  7. Market presence and audience
Raw lines 17 to 35
36## Research Process
38For each competitor, research using web search:
401. **Company website** — homepage messaging, product pages, about page, pricing page
412. **Recent news** — press releases, funding announcements, product launches, partnerships (last 6 months)
423. **Content strategy** — blog topics, resource types, social media presence, webinars, podcasts
434. **Review sites and comparisons** — third-party comparisons, analyst mentions, customer review themes
445. **Job postings** — hiring signals that indicate strategic direction (optional)

Research Process

For each competitor, research using web search:

  1. Company website — homepage messaging, product pages, about page, pricing page
  2. Recent news — press releases, funding announcements, product launches, partnerships (last 6 months)
  3. Content strategy — blog topics, resource types, social media presence, webinars, podcasts
  4. Review sites and comparisons — third-party comparisons, analyst mentions, customer review themes
  5. Job postings — hiring signals that indicate strategic direction (optional)
Raw lines 36 to 45
46### Research Sources
48Gather intelligence from these categories of sources:
50#### Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor)
51- **Website**: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers
52- **Blog and resource center**: content themes, publishing frequency, depth
53- **Social media profiles**: messaging, engagement, content strategy
54- **Product demos and free trials**: UX, features, onboarding experience
55- **Webinars and events**: topics, speakers, audience engagement
56- **Press releases and newsroom**: announcements, partnerships, milestones
57- **Job postings**: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities (e.g., hiring for a new product line or market)
59#### Secondary Sources (Third-Party)
60- **Review sites**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt — customer sentiment themes
61- **Analyst reports**: Gartner, Forrester, IDC — market positioning and category placement
62- **News coverage**: TechCrunch, industry publications — funding, partnerships, narrative
63- **Social listening**: mentions, sentiment, share of voice across social platforms
64- **SEO tools**: keyword rankings, organic traffic estimates, content gaps
65- **Financial filings**: revenue, growth rate, investment areas (for public companies)
66- **Community forums**: community forums (e.g. Reddit, Discourse), industry chat groups (e.g. Slack communities) — user sentiment

Research Sources

Gather intelligence from these categories of sources:

Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor)

  • Website: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers
  • Blog and resource center: content themes, publishing frequency, depth
  • Social media profiles: messaging, engagement, content strategy
  • Product demos and free trials: UX, features, onboarding experience
  • Webinars and events: topics, speakers, audience engagement
  • Press releases and newsroom: announcements, partnerships, milestones
  • Job postings: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities (e.g., hiring for a new product line or market)

Secondary Sources (Third-Party)

  • Review sites: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt — customer sentiment themes
  • Analyst reports: Gartner, Forrester, IDC — market positioning and category placement
  • News coverage: TechCrunch, industry publications — funding, partnerships, narrative
  • Social listening: mentions, sentiment, share of voice across social platforms
  • SEO tools: keyword rankings, organic traffic estimates, content gaps
  • Financial filings: revenue, growth rate, investment areas (for public companies)
  • Community forums: community forums (e.g. Reddit, Discourse), industry chat groups (e.g. Slack communities) — user sentiment
Raw lines 46 to 67
68### Research Cadence
69- **Deep competitive analysis**: quarterly (full research across all sources)
70- **Competitive monitoring**: monthly (scan for new announcements, content, messaging changes)
71- **Real-time alerts**: ongoing (set up alerts for competitor brand mentions, press, job postings)

Research Cadence

  • Deep competitive analysis: quarterly (full research across all sources)
  • Competitive monitoring: monthly (scan for new announcements, content, messaging changes)
  • Real-time alerts: ongoing (set up alerts for competitor brand mentions, press, job postings)
Raw lines 68 to 72
73## Competitive Brief Structure

Competitive Brief Structure

Raw lines 73 to 74
75### 1. Executive Summary
76- 2-3 sentence overview of the competitive landscape
77- Key takeaway: your biggest opportunity and biggest threat

1. Executive Summary

  • 2-3 sentence overview of the competitive landscape
  • Key takeaway: your biggest opportunity and biggest threat
Raw lines 75 to 78
79### 2. Competitor Profiles
81For each competitor:
83#### Company Overview
84- What they do (one-sentence positioning)
85- Target audience
86- Company size/stage indicators (funding, employee count if available)
87- Key recent developments
89#### Messaging Analysis
90- Primary tagline or headline
91- Core value proposition
92- Key messaging themes (3-5)
93- Tone and voice characterization
94- How they describe the problem they solve
96#### Product/Solution Positioning
97- How they categorize their product
98- Key features they emphasize
99- Claimed differentiators
100- Pricing approach (if publicly available)
102#### Content Strategy
103- Blog frequency and topics
104- Content types produced (ebooks, webinars, case studies, tools)
105- Social media presence and engagement approach
106- Thought leadership themes
107- SEO strategy observations (what terms they appear to target)
109#### Strengths
110- What they do well
111- Where their messaging resonates
112- Competitive advantages
114#### Weaknesses
115- Gaps in their messaging or positioning
116- Areas where they are vulnerable
117- Customer complaints or criticism themes (from reviews)

2. Competitor Profiles

For each competitor:

Company Overview

  • What they do (one-sentence positioning)
  • Target audience
  • Company size/stage indicators (funding, employee count if available)
  • Key recent developments

Messaging Analysis

  • Primary tagline or headline
  • Core value proposition
  • Key messaging themes (3-5)
  • Tone and voice characterization
  • How they describe the problem they solve

Product/Solution Positioning

  • How they categorize their product
  • Key features they emphasize
  • Claimed differentiators
  • Pricing approach (if publicly available)

Content Strategy

  • Blog frequency and topics
  • Content types produced (ebooks, webinars, case studies, tools)
  • Social media presence and engagement approach
  • Thought leadership themes
  • SEO strategy observations (what terms they appear to target)

Strengths

  • What they do well
  • Where their messaging resonates
  • Competitive advantages

Weaknesses

  • Gaps in their messaging or positioning
  • Areas where they are vulnerable
  • Customer complaints or criticism themes (from reviews)
Raw lines 79 to 118
119### 3. Messaging Comparison Matrix
121| Dimension | Your Company | Competitor A | Competitor B |
122|-----------|-------------|--------------|--------------|
123| Primary tagline | ... | ... | ... |
124| Target buyer | ... | ... | ... |
125| Key differentiator | ... | ... | ... |
126| Tone/voice | ... | ... | ... |
127| Core value prop | ... | ... | ... |
129(Include user's company only if they provided their positioning context)

3. Messaging Comparison Matrix

DimensionYour CompanyCompetitor ACompetitor B
Primary tagline.........
Target buyer.........
Key differentiator.........
Tone/voice.........
Core value prop.........

(Include user's company only if they provided their positioning context)

Raw lines 119 to 130
131### 4. Content Gap Analysis
132- Topics your competitors cover that you do not (or vice versa)
133- Content formats they use that you could adopt
134- Keywords or themes they own vs. opportunities they have missed

4. Content Gap Analysis

  • Topics your competitors cover that you do not (or vice versa)
  • Content formats they use that you could adopt
  • Keywords or themes they own vs. opportunities they have missed
Raw lines 131 to 135
136### 5. Opportunities
137- Positioning gaps you can exploit
138- Messaging angles your competitors have not claimed
139- Audience segments they are underserving
140- Content or channel opportunities

5. Opportunities

  • Positioning gaps you can exploit
  • Messaging angles your competitors have not claimed
  • Audience segments they are underserving
  • Content or channel opportunities
Raw lines 136 to 141
142### 6. Threats
143- Areas where competitors are strong and you are vulnerable
144- Trends that favor their positioning
145- Recent moves that could shift the market

6. Threats

  • Areas where competitors are strong and you are vulnerable
  • Trends that favor their positioning
  • Recent moves that could shift the market
Raw lines 142 to 146
147### 7. Recommended Actions
148- 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on the analysis
149- Quick wins (things you can act on this week)
150- Strategic moves (longer-term positioning or content investments)

7. Recommended Actions

  • 3-5 specific, actionable recommendations based on the analysis
  • Quick wins (things you can act on this week)
  • Strategic moves (longer-term positioning or content investments)
Raw lines 147 to 151
152## Analysis Frameworks

Analysis Frameworks

Raw lines 152 to 153
154### Messaging Comparison Frameworks
156#### Value Proposition Comparison
158For each competitor, document:
159- **Promise**: what they promise the customer will achieve
160- **Evidence**: how they prove the promise (data, testimonials, demos)
161- **Mechanism**: how their product delivers on the promise (the "how it works")
162- **Uniqueness**: what they claim only they can do
164#### Narrative Analysis
166Identify each competitor's story arc:
167- **Villain**: what problem or enemy they position against (status quo, legacy tools, complexity)
168- **Hero**: who is the hero in their story (the customer? the product? the team?)
169- **Transformation**: what before/after do they promise?
170- **Stakes**: what happens if you do not act?
172This reveals positioning strategy and emotional appeals.
174#### Messaging Strengths and Vulnerabilities
176For each competitor's messaging, assess:
177- **Clarity**: can a first-time visitor understand what they do in 5 seconds?
178- **Differentiation**: is their positioning distinct or generic?
179- **Proof**: do they back up claims with evidence?
180- **Consistency**: is messaging consistent across channels?
181- **Resonance**: does their messaging address real customer pain points?

Messaging Comparison Frameworks

Value Proposition Comparison

For each competitor, document:

  • Promise: what they promise the customer will achieve
  • Evidence: how they prove the promise (data, testimonials, demos)
  • Mechanism: how their product delivers on the promise (the "how it works")
  • Uniqueness: what they claim only they can do

Narrative Analysis

Identify each competitor's story arc:

  • Villain: what problem or enemy they position against (status quo, legacy tools, complexity)
  • Hero: who is the hero in their story (the customer? the product? the team?)
  • Transformation: what before/after do they promise?
  • Stakes: what happens if you do not act?

This reveals positioning strategy and emotional appeals.

Messaging Strengths and Vulnerabilities

For each competitor's messaging, assess:

  • Clarity: can a first-time visitor understand what they do in 5 seconds?
  • Differentiation: is their positioning distinct or generic?
  • Proof: do they back up claims with evidence?
  • Consistency: is messaging consistent across channels?
  • Resonance: does their messaging address real customer pain points?
Raw lines 154 to 182
183### Content Gap Analysis Methodology
185#### Content Audit Comparison
187Map content across competitors by:
189| Topic/Theme | Your Content | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? |
190|-------------|-------------|--------------|--------------|------|
191| [Topic 1] | Blog post, ebook | Blog series, webinar | Nothing | Opportunity for B |
192| [Topic 2] | Nothing | Whitepaper | Blog post, video | Gap for you |
193| [Topic 3] | Case study | Nothing | Case study | Parity |
195#### Content Type Coverage
197| Content Format | You | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
198|----------------|-----|--------|--------|--------|
199| Blog posts | Y | Y | Y | Y |
200| Case studies | Y | Y | N | Y |
201| Ebooks/Whitepapers | N | Y | Y | N |
202| Webinars | Y | Y | Y | N |
203| Podcast | N | N | Y | N |
204| Video content | N | Y | Y | Y |
205| Interactive tools | N | N | N | Y |
206| Templates/Resources | Y | N | Y | N |
208#### Identifying Content Opportunities
2091. **Topics they cover that you do not**: potential gaps in your content strategy
2102. **Topics you cover that they do not**: potential differentiators to amplify
2113. **Formats they use that you do not**: format gaps that could reach new audiences
2124. **Audience segments they address that you do not**: underserved audiences
2135. **Search terms they rank for that you do not**: SEO content gaps
215#### Content Quality Assessment
216- Depth: surface-level or comprehensive?
217- Freshness: regularly updated or stale?
218- Engagement: do posts get comments, shares, links?
219- Production value: text-only or multimedia?
220- Thought leadership: original insights or rehashed content?

Content Gap Analysis Methodology

Content Audit Comparison

Map content across competitors by:

Topic/ThemeYour ContentCompetitor ACompetitor BGap?
[Topic 1]Blog post, ebookBlog series, webinarNothingOpportunity for B
[Topic 2]NothingWhitepaperBlog post, videoGap for you
[Topic 3]Case studyNothingCase studyParity

Content Type Coverage

Content FormatYouComp AComp BComp C
Blog postsYYYY
Case studiesYYNY
Ebooks/WhitepapersNYYN
WebinarsYYYN
PodcastNNYN
Video contentNYYY
Interactive toolsNNNY
Templates/ResourcesYNYN

Identifying Content Opportunities

  1. Topics they cover that you do not: potential gaps in your content strategy
  2. Topics you cover that they do not: potential differentiators to amplify
  3. Formats they use that you do not: format gaps that could reach new audiences
  4. Audience segments they address that you do not: underserved audiences
  5. Search terms they rank for that you do not: SEO content gaps

Content Quality Assessment

  • Depth: surface-level or comprehensive?
  • Freshness: regularly updated or stale?
  • Engagement: do posts get comments, shares, links?
  • Production value: text-only or multimedia?
  • Thought leadership: original insights or rehashed content?
Raw lines 183 to 221
222### Positioning Strategy
224#### Positioning Statement Framework
226For your company and each competitor, define (or reverse-engineer) their positioning statement:
228> For [target audience], [product/company] is the [category] that [key benefit/differentiator] because [reason to believe].
230Example:
231> For mid-market SaaS marketing teams, Acme is the campaign management platform that unifies planning and execution in one workspace because it is built on a single data model that eliminates tool fragmentation.
233#### Positioning Map
235Plot competitors on a 2x2 matrix using the two most important dimensions for your market:
237Common axis pairs:
238- **Price vs. Capability** (low cost / basic vs. premium / full-featured)
239- **Ease of Use vs. Power** (simple / limited vs. complex / flexible)
240- **SMB Focus vs. Enterprise Focus** (self-serve / individual vs. sales-led / team)
241- **Point Solution vs. Platform** (does one thing well vs. does many things)
242- **Innovative vs. Established** (new approach vs. proven track record)
244Identify which quadrant is underserved or where your differentiation is strongest.
246#### Category Strategy
247- **Create a new category**: if you do something genuinely different, define and own the category (high risk, high reward)
248- **Reframe the existing category**: change how buyers evaluate the category to favor your strengths
249- **Win the existing category**: compete directly on recognized criteria and out-execute
250- **Niche within the category**: own a specific segment, use case, or audience
252#### Positioning Pitfalls to Avoid
253- Positioning against a competitor rather than for a customer need
254- Claiming too many differentiators (pick 1-2 that matter most)
255- Using category jargon the customer does not use
256- Positioning on features rather than outcomes
257- Changing positioning too frequently (confuses the market)

Positioning Strategy

Positioning Statement Framework

For your company and each competitor, define (or reverse-engineer) their positioning statement:

For [target audience], [product/company] is the [category] that [key benefit/differentiator] because [reason to believe].

Example:

For mid-market SaaS marketing teams, Acme is the campaign management platform that unifies planning and execution in one workspace because it is built on a single data model that eliminates tool fragmentation.

Positioning Map

Plot competitors on a 2x2 matrix using the two most important dimensions for your market:

Common axis pairs:

  • Price vs. Capability (low cost / basic vs. premium / full-featured)
  • Ease of Use vs. Power (simple / limited vs. complex / flexible)
  • SMB Focus vs. Enterprise Focus (self-serve / individual vs. sales-led / team)
  • Point Solution vs. Platform (does one thing well vs. does many things)
  • Innovative vs. Established (new approach vs. proven track record)

Identify which quadrant is underserved or where your differentiation is strongest.

Category Strategy

  • Create a new category: if you do something genuinely different, define and own the category (high risk, high reward)
  • Reframe the existing category: change how buyers evaluate the category to favor your strengths
  • Win the existing category: compete directly on recognized criteria and out-execute
  • Niche within the category: own a specific segment, use case, or audience

Positioning Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Positioning against a competitor rather than for a customer need
  • Claiming too many differentiators (pick 1-2 that matter most)
  • Using category jargon the customer does not use
  • Positioning on features rather than outcomes
  • Changing positioning too frequently (confuses the market)
Raw lines 222 to 258
259### Battlecard Creation
261A competitive battlecard is a one-page reference for sales and marketing teams. Include:
263#### Header
264- Competitor name and logo
265- Last updated date
266- Competitive win rate (if tracked)
268#### Quick Overview
269- What they do (one sentence)
270- Their target customer
271- Pricing model summary
272- Key recent developments
274#### Their Pitch
275- How they describe themselves
276- Their primary tagline
277- Their top 3 claimed differentiators
279#### Strengths (Be Honest)
280- Where they genuinely compete well
281- What customers like about them (from reviews)
282- Features or capabilities where they lead
284#### Weaknesses
285- Consistent customer complaints (from reviews)
286- Technical limitations
287- Gaps in their offering
288- Areas where customers report dissatisfaction
290#### Our Differentiators
291- 3-5 specific ways your product or approach is different
292- For each: the differentiator, why it matters to the customer, and proof
294#### Objection Handling
295| If the prospect says... | Respond with... |
296|------------------------|----------------|
297| "[Competitor] does X too" | "Here is how our approach differs..." |
298| "[Competitor] is cheaper" | "Here is what that price difference gets you..." |
299| "I've heard good things about [Competitor]" | "They are strong at X. Where we differ is..." |
301#### Landmines to Set
302Questions to ask prospects early that highlight your advantages:
303- "How do you currently handle [area where competitor is weak]?"
304- "How important is [capability you have that they lack]?"
305- "Have you considered [risk that your product mitigates]?"
307#### Landmines to Defuse
308Questions competitors might encourage prospects to ask you, with prepared responses.
310#### Win/Loss Themes
311- Common reasons deals are won against this competitor
312- Common reasons deals are lost to this competitor
313- What types of prospects favor them vs. you
315#### Battlecard Maintenance
316- Review and update quarterly at minimum
317- Update immediately after major competitor announcements
318- Incorporate win/loss feedback from sales team
319- Track which objection-handling responses are most effective

Battlecard Creation

A competitive battlecard is a one-page reference for sales and marketing teams. Include:

Header

  • Competitor name and logo
  • Last updated date
  • Competitive win rate (if tracked)

Quick Overview

  • What they do (one sentence)
  • Their target customer
  • Pricing model summary
  • Key recent developments

Their Pitch

  • How they describe themselves
  • Their primary tagline
  • Their top 3 claimed differentiators

Strengths (Be Honest)

  • Where they genuinely compete well
  • What customers like about them (from reviews)
  • Features or capabilities where they lead

Weaknesses

  • Consistent customer complaints (from reviews)
  • Technical limitations
  • Gaps in their offering
  • Areas where customers report dissatisfaction

Our Differentiators

  • 3-5 specific ways your product or approach is different
  • For each: the differentiator, why it matters to the customer, and proof

Objection Handling

If the prospect says...Respond with...
"[Competitor] does X too""Here is how our approach differs..."
"[Competitor] is cheaper""Here is what that price difference gets you..."
"I've heard good things about [Competitor]""They are strong at X. Where we differ is..."

Landmines to Set

Questions to ask prospects early that highlight your advantages:

  • "How do you currently handle [area where competitor is weak]?"
  • "How important is [capability you have that they lack]?"
  • "Have you considered [risk that your product mitigates]?"

Landmines to Defuse

Questions competitors might encourage prospects to ask you, with prepared responses.

Win/Loss Themes

  • Common reasons deals are won against this competitor
  • Common reasons deals are lost to this competitor
  • What types of prospects favor them vs. you

Battlecard Maintenance

  • Review and update quarterly at minimum
  • Update immediately after major competitor announcements
  • Incorporate win/loss feedback from sales team
  • Track which objection-handling responses are most effective
Raw lines 259 to 320
321## Output
323Present the full competitive brief with clear formatting. Note the date of the research so the user knows the freshness of the data.
325After the brief, ask:
327"Would you like me to:
328- Create a battlecard for your sales team based on this analysis?
329- Draft messaging that exploits the positioning gaps identified?
330- Dive deeper into any specific competitor?
331- Set up a competitive monitoring plan?"

Output

Present the full competitive brief with clear formatting. Note the date of the research so the user knows the freshness of the data.

After the brief, ask:

"Would you like me to:

  • Create a battlecard for your sales team based on this analysis?
  • Draft messaging that exploits the positioning gaps identified?
  • Dive deeper into any specific competitor?
  • Set up a competitive monitoring plan?"
Raw lines 321 to 331

From anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins at 2574e29, 2026-10-27. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.