incident-response
The facts
Its description
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.
When it starts
The agent picks this skill when someone reports a live production problem — an outage, a degraded service, or an alert that needs a severity call — or when someone asks for a status update during an incident or a blameless postmortem after it is resolved. It is a person-triggered workflow, not something another skill loads.
Things a person might say (the model's guesses)
- “Production is down for all users, we need to triage this now”
- “Here's the alert that just fired — what severity is this?”
- “Can you write the blameless postmortem for yesterday's outage?”
A model's summary of when it is used.
What it takes when started
<incident description or alert>
What to type after its name when you start it.
Licence
Apache-2.0, from LICENSE
The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.
The text
Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.
/incident-response
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Manage an incident from detection through postmortem.
Raw lines 1 to 12Boilerplate, lines 13 to 18. The same text appears in 24 other files here. Close
Modes
/incident-response new [description] # Start a new incident
/incident-response update [status] # Post a status update
/incident-response postmortem # Generate postmortem from incident dataIf no mode is specified, ask what phase the incident is in.
Raw lines 19 to 28How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INCIDENT RESPONSE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Phase 1: TRIAGE │
│ ✓ Assess severity (SEV1-4) │
│ ✓ Identify affected systems and users │
│ ✓ Assign roles (IC, comms, responders) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: COMMUNICATE │
│ ✓ Draft internal status update │
│ ✓ Draft customer communication (if needed) │
│ ✓ Set up war room and cadence │
│ │
│ Phase 3: MITIGATE │
│ ✓ Document mitigation steps taken │
│ ✓ Track timeline of events │
│ ✓ Confirm resolution │
│ │
│ Phase 4: POSTMORTEM │
│ ✓ Blameless postmortem document │
│ ✓ Timeline reconstruction │
│ ✓ Root cause analysis (5 whys) │
│ ✓ Action items with owners │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Raw lines 29 to 57Severity Classification
| Level | Criteria | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Service down, all users affected | Immediate, all-hands |
| SEV2 | Major feature degraded, many users affected | Within 15 min |
| SEV3 | Minor feature issue, some users affected | Within 1 hour |
| SEV4 | Cosmetic or low-impact issue | Next business day |
Communication Guidance
Provide clear, factual updates at regular cadence. Include: what's happening, who's affected, what we're doing, when the next update is.
Raw lines 67 to 70Output — Status Update
## Incident Update: [Title]
**Severity:** SEV[1-4] | **Status:** Investigating | Identified | Monitoring | Resolved
**Impact:** [Who/what is affected]
**Last Updated:** [Timestamp]
### Current Status
[What we know now]
### Actions Taken
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
### Next Steps
- [What's happening next and ETA]
### Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |Raw lines 71 to 94Output — Postmortem
## Postmortem: [Incident Title]
**Date:** [Date] | **Duration:** [X hours] | **Severity:** SEV[X]
**Authors:** [Names] | **Status:** Draft
### Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-language summary]
### Impact
- [Users affected]
- [Duration of impact]
- [Business impact if quantifiable]
### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |
### Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of what caused the incident]
### 5 Whys
1. Why did [symptom]? → [Because...]
2. Why did [cause 1]? → [Because...]
3. Why did [cause 2]? → [Because...]
4. Why did [cause 3]? → [Because...]
5. Why did [cause 4]? → [Root cause]
### What Went Well
- [Things that worked]
### What Went Poorly
- [Things that didn't work]
### Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| [Action] | [Person] | P0/P1/P2 | [Date] |
### Lessons Learned
[Key takeaways for the team]Raw lines 95 to 139If Connectors Available
If ~~monitoring is connected:
- Pull alert details and metrics
- Show graphs of affected metrics
If ~~incident management is connected:
- Create or update incident in PagerDuty/Opsgenie
- Page on-call responders
If ~~chat is connected:
- Post status updates to incident channel
- Create war room channel
Tips
- Start writing immediately — Don't wait for complete information. Update as you learn more.
- Keep updates factual — What we know, what we've done, what's next. No speculation.
- Postmortems are blameless — Focus on systems and processes, not individuals.
From anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins at 2574e29, 2026-10-27. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.