Skill Tracer
Skills › Knowledge Work Plugins › metrics-review

metrics-review

skill · 388 lines · Apache-2.0 · product-management/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md

The facts

Its description

Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.

The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.

From its settingsline 3

When it starts

Someone asks for a product metrics review on a cadence (weekly, monthly, quarterly), or asks to explain a sudden spike or drop in a metric, compare numbers against targets, or turn raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.

Things a person might say (the model's guesses)

  • “Can you put together our monthly product metrics review?”
  • “Our activation rate dropped 15% last week — what happened?”
  • “Here's our Q3 numbers, how are we tracking against our OKR targets?”

A model's summary of when it is used.

A model's reading

What it takes when started

<time period or metric focus>

What to type after its name when you start it.

From its settingsline 4

Stops for a person

2 lines stop to ask a person

Lines that stop and wait for a person before going on. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.

Found by matching wordsline 28 line 33

Licence

Apache-2.0, from product-management/LICENSE

The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.

From the repositorylicence text

The text

Open on GitHub

Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.

1---
2name: metrics-review
3description: Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
4argument-hint: "<time period or metric focus>"
5---
6
7# Metrics Review
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
11Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.

Metrics Review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.

Raw lines 1 to 12
Boilerplate, lines 13 to 18. The same text appears in 24 other files here. Close
13## Usage
15```
16/metrics-review $ARGUMENTS
17```
19## Workflow
21### 1. Gather Metrics Data
23If **~~product analytics** is connected:
24- Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period
25- Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets)
26- Pull segment breakdowns if available
28If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
29- The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
30- Comparison data (previous period, targets)
31- Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)
33Ask the user:
34- What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
35- What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
36- Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
37- Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?

1. Gather Metrics Data

If ~~product analytics is connected:

  • Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period
  • Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets)
  • Pull segment breakdowns if available

If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:

  • The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
  • Comparison data (previous period, targets)
  • Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)

Ask the user:

  • What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
  • What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
  • Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
  • Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
Raw lines 21 to 38
Uses an outside tool ~~product :23
Involves a person ask the user :28
Involves a person Ask the user :33
39### 2. Organize the Metrics
41Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See **Product Metrics Hierarchy** below for full definitions.
43If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.

2. Organize the Metrics

Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.

If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.

Raw lines 39 to 44
45### 3. Analyze Trends
47For each key metric:
48- **Current value**: What is the metric today?
49- **Trend**: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
50- **vs Target**: How does it compare to the goal or target?
51- **Rate of change**: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
52- **Anomalies**: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?
54Identify correlations:
55- Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
56- Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
57- Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?

3. Analyze Trends

For each key metric:

  • Current value: What is the metric today?
  • Trend: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
  • vs Target: How does it compare to the goal or target?
  • Rate of change: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
  • Anomalies: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?

Identify correlations:

  • Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
  • Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
  • Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
Raw lines 45 to 58
59### 4. Generate the Review
61#### Summary
622-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
64#### Metric Scorecard
65Table format for quick scanning:
67| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
68|--------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------|
69| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
71#### Trend Analysis
72For each metric worth discussing:
73- What happened and how significant is the change
74- Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
75- Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
77#### Bright Spots
78What is going well:
79- Metrics beating targets
80- Positive trends to sustain
81- Segments or features showing strong performance
83#### Areas of Concern
84What needs attention:
85- Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
86- Early warning signals before they become problems
87- Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding
89#### Recommended Actions
90Specific next steps based on the analysis:
91- Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
92- Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
93- Investments to make (double down on what is working)
94- Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
96#### Context and Caveats
97- Known data quality issues
98- Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
99- Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet

4. Generate the Review

Summary

2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.

Metric Scorecard

Table format for quick scanning:

MetricCurrentPreviousChangeTargetStatus
[Metric][Value][Value][+/- %][Target][On track / At risk / Miss]

Trend Analysis

For each metric worth discussing:

  • What happened and how significant is the change
  • Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
  • Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend

Bright Spots

What is going well:

  • Metrics beating targets
  • Positive trends to sustain
  • Segments or features showing strong performance

Areas of Concern

What needs attention:

  • Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
  • Early warning signals before they become problems
  • Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding

Recommended Actions

Specific next steps based on the analysis:

  • Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
  • Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
  • Investments to make (double down on what is working)
  • Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)

Context and Caveats

  • Known data quality issues
  • Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
  • Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
Raw lines 59 to 100
101### 5. Follow Up
103After generating the review:
104- Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
106- Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern

5. Follow Up

After generating the review:

Raw lines 101 to 108
Names a skill build-dashboard :105
Names a skill report-builder :107
109## Product Metrics Hierarchy

Product Metrics Hierarchy

Raw lines 109 to 110
111### North Star Metric
112The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
114- **Value-aligned**: Moves when users get more value from the product
115- **Leading**: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
116- **Actionable**: The product team can influence it through their work
117- **Understandable**: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters
119**Examples by product type**:
120- Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
121- Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
122- SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
123- Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
124- Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool

North Star Metric

The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:

  • Value-aligned: Moves when users get more value from the product
  • Leading: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
  • Actionable: The product team can influence it through their work
  • Understandable: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters

Examples by product type:

  • Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
  • Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
  • SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
  • Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
  • Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
Raw lines 111 to 125
126### L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)
127The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
129**Acquisition**: Are new users finding the product?
130- New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
131- Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
132- Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
133- Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)
135**Activation**: Are new users reaching the value moment?
136- Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
137- Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
138- Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
139- First value moment: when users first experience the core product value
141**Engagement**: Are active users getting value?
142- DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
143- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users come back daily
144- Core action frequency: how often users do the thing that matters most
145- Session depth: how much users do per session
146- Feature adoption: % of users using key features
148**Retention**: Are users coming back?
149- D1, D7, D30 retention: % of users who return after 1 day, 7 days, 30 days
150- Cohort retention curves: how retention evolves for each signup cohort
151- Churn rate: % of users or revenue lost per period
152- Resurrection rate: % of churned users who come back
154**Monetization**: Is value translating to revenue?
155- Conversion rate: free to paid (for freemium)
156- MRR / ARR: monthly or annual recurring revenue
157- ARPU / ARPA: average revenue per user or account
158- Expansion revenue: revenue growth from existing customers
159- Net revenue retention: revenue retention including expansion and contraction
161**Satisfaction**: How do users feel about the product?
162- NPS: Net Promoter Score
163- CSAT: Customer Satisfaction Score
164- Support ticket volume and resolution time
165- App store ratings and review sentiment

L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)

The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:

Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?

  • New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
  • Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
  • Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
  • Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)

Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?

  • Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
  • Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
  • Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
  • First value moment: when users first experience the core product value

Engagement: Are active users getting value?

  • DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
  • DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users come back daily
  • Core action frequency: how often users do the thing that matters most
  • Session depth: how much users do per session
  • Feature adoption: % of users using key features

Retention: Are users coming back?

  • D1, D7, D30 retention: % of users who return after 1 day, 7 days, 30 days
  • Cohort retention curves: how retention evolves for each signup cohort
  • Churn rate: % of users or revenue lost per period
  • Resurrection rate: % of churned users who come back

Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?

  • Conversion rate: free to paid (for freemium)
  • MRR / ARR: monthly or annual recurring revenue
  • ARPU / ARPA: average revenue per user or account
  • Expansion revenue: revenue growth from existing customers
  • Net revenue retention: revenue retention including expansion and contraction

Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?

  • NPS: Net Promoter Score
  • CSAT: Customer Satisfaction Score
  • Support ticket volume and resolution time
  • App store ratings and review sentiment
Raw lines 126 to 166
167### L2 Metrics (Diagnostic)
168Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
170- Funnel conversion at each step
171- Feature-level usage and adoption
172- Segment-specific breakdowns (by plan, company size, geography, user role)
173- Performance metrics (page load time, error rate, API latency)
174- Content-specific engagement (which features, pages, or content types drive engagement)

L2 Metrics (Diagnostic)

Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:

  • Funnel conversion at each step
  • Feature-level usage and adoption
  • Segment-specific breakdowns (by plan, company size, geography, user role)
  • Performance metrics (page load time, error rate, API latency)
  • Content-specific engagement (which features, pages, or content types drive engagement)
Raw lines 167 to 175
176## Common Product Metrics

Common Product Metrics

Raw lines 176 to 177
178### DAU / WAU / MAU
179**What they measure**: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
181**Key decisions**:
182- What counts as "active"? A login? A page view? A core action? Define this carefully — different definitions tell different stories.
183- Which timeframe matters most? DAU for daily-use products (messaging, email). WAU for weekly-use products (project management). MAU for less frequent products (tax software, travel booking).
185**How to use them**:
186- DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): values above 0.5 indicate a daily habit. Below 0.2 suggests infrequent usage.
187- Trend matters more than absolute number. Is active usage growing, flat, or declining?
188- Segment by user type. Power users and casual users behave very differently.

DAU / WAU / MAU

What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.

Key decisions:

  • What counts as "active"? A login? A page view? A core action? Define this carefully — different definitions tell different stories.
  • Which timeframe matters most? DAU for daily-use products (messaging, email). WAU for weekly-use products (project management). MAU for less frequent products (tax software, travel booking).

How to use them:

  • DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): values above 0.5 indicate a daily habit. Below 0.2 suggests infrequent usage.
  • Trend matters more than absolute number. Is active usage growing, flat, or declining?
  • Segment by user type. Power users and casual users behave very differently.
Raw lines 178 to 189
190### Retention
191**What it measures**: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
193**Common retention timeframes**:
194- D1 (next day): Was the first experience good enough to come back?
195- D7 (one week): Did the user establish a habit?
196- D30 (one month): Is the user retained long-term?
197- D90 (three months): Is this a durable user?
199**How to use retention**:
200- Plot retention curves by cohort. Look for: initial drop-off (activation problem), steady decline (engagement problem), or flattening (good — you have a stable retained base).
201- Compare cohorts over time. Are newer cohorts retaining better than older ones? That means product improvements are working.
202- Segment retention by activation behavior. Users who completed onboarding vs those who did not. Users who used feature X vs those who did not.

Retention

What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?

Common retention timeframes:

  • D1 (next day): Was the first experience good enough to come back?
  • D7 (one week): Did the user establish a habit?
  • D30 (one month): Is the user retained long-term?
  • D90 (three months): Is this a durable user?

How to use retention:

  • Plot retention curves by cohort. Look for: initial drop-off (activation problem), steady decline (engagement problem), or flattening (good — you have a stable retained base).
  • Compare cohorts over time. Are newer cohorts retaining better than older ones? That means product improvements are working.
  • Segment retention by activation behavior. Users who completed onboarding vs those who did not. Users who used feature X vs those who did not.
Raw lines 190 to 203
204### Conversion
205**What it measures**: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
207**Common conversion funnels**:
208- Visitor to signup
209- Signup to activation (key value moment)
210- Free to paid (trial conversion)
211- Trial to paid subscription
212- Monthly to annual plan
214**How to use conversion**:
215- Map the full funnel and measure conversion at each step
216- Identify the biggest drop-off points — these are your highest-leverage improvement opportunities
217- Segment conversion by source, plan, user type. Different segments convert very differently.
218- Track conversion over time. Is it improving as you iterate on the experience?

Conversion

What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.

Common conversion funnels:

  • Visitor to signup
  • Signup to activation (key value moment)
  • Free to paid (trial conversion)
  • Trial to paid subscription
  • Monthly to annual plan

How to use conversion:

  • Map the full funnel and measure conversion at each step
  • Identify the biggest drop-off points — these are your highest-leverage improvement opportunities
  • Segment conversion by source, plan, user type. Different segments convert very differently.
  • Track conversion over time. Is it improving as you iterate on the experience?
Raw lines 204 to 219
220### Activation
221**What it measures**: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
223**Defining activation**:
224- Look at retained users vs churned users. What actions did retained users take that churned users did not?
225- The activation event should be strongly predictive of long-term retention
226- It should be achievable within the first session or first few days
227- Examples: created first project, invited a teammate, completed first workflow, connected an integration
229**How to use activation**:
230- Track activation rate for every signup cohort
231- Measure time to activate — faster is almost always better
232- Build onboarding flows that guide users to the activation moment
233- A/B test activation flows and measure impact on retention, not just activation rate

Activation

What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.

Defining activation:

  • Look at retained users vs churned users. What actions did retained users take that churned users did not?
  • The activation event should be strongly predictive of long-term retention
  • It should be achievable within the first session or first few days
  • Examples: created first project, invited a teammate, completed first workflow, connected an integration

How to use activation:

  • Track activation rate for every signup cohort
  • Measure time to activate — faster is almost always better
  • Build onboarding flows that guide users to the activation moment
  • A/B test activation flows and measure impact on retention, not just activation rate
Raw lines 220 to 234
235## Goal Setting Frameworks

Goal Setting Frameworks

Raw lines 235 to 236
237### OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
239**Objectives**: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
240- Inspiring and memorable
241- Time-bound (quarterly or annually)
242- Directional, not metric-specific
244**Key Results**: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
245- Specific and measurable
246- Time-bound with a clear target
247- Outcome-based, not output-based
248- 2-4 Key Results per Objective
250**Example**:
251```
252Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
254Key Results:
255- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
256- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
257- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate
258```

OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)

Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.

  • Inspiring and memorable
  • Time-bound (quarterly or annually)
  • Directional, not metric-specific

Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.

  • Specific and measurable
  • Time-bound with a clear target
  • Outcome-based, not output-based
  • 2-4 Key Results per Objective

Example:

Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows

Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate
Raw lines 237 to 259
260### OKR Best Practices
261- Set OKRs that are ambitious but achievable. 70% completion is the target for stretch OKRs.
262- Key Results should measure outcomes (user behavior, business results), not outputs (features shipped, tasks completed).
263- Do not have too many OKRs. 2-3 objectives with 2-4 KRs each is plenty.
264- OKRs should be uncomfortable. If you are confident you will hit all of them, they are not ambitious enough.
265- Review OKRs at mid-period. Adjust effort allocation if some KRs are clearly off track.
266- Grade OKRs honestly at end of period. 0.0-0.3 = missed, 0.4-0.6 = progress, 0.7-1.0 = achieved.

OKR Best Practices

  • Set OKRs that are ambitious but achievable. 70% completion is the target for stretch OKRs.
  • Key Results should measure outcomes (user behavior, business results), not outputs (features shipped, tasks completed).
  • Do not have too many OKRs. 2-3 objectives with 2-4 KRs each is plenty.
  • OKRs should be uncomfortable. If you are confident you will hit all of them, they are not ambitious enough.
  • Review OKRs at mid-period. Adjust effort allocation if some KRs are clearly off track.
  • Grade OKRs honestly at end of period. 0.0-0.3 = missed, 0.4-0.6 = progress, 0.7-1.0 = achieved.
Raw lines 260 to 267
268### Setting Metric Targets
269- **Baseline**: What is the current value? You need a reliable baseline before setting a target.
270- **Benchmark**: What do comparable products achieve? Industry benchmarks provide context.
271- **Trajectory**: What is the current trend? If the metric is already improving at 5% per month, a 6% target is not ambitious.
272- **Effort**: How much investment are you putting behind this? Bigger bets warrant more ambitious targets.
273- **Confidence**: How confident are you in hitting the target? Set a "commit" (high confidence) and a "stretch" (ambitious).

Setting Metric Targets

  • Baseline: What is the current value? You need a reliable baseline before setting a target.
  • Benchmark: What do comparable products achieve? Industry benchmarks provide context.
  • Trajectory: What is the current trend? If the metric is already improving at 5% per month, a 6% target is not ambitious.
  • Effort: How much investment are you putting behind this? Bigger bets warrant more ambitious targets.
  • Confidence: How confident are you in hitting the target? Set a "commit" (high confidence) and a "stretch" (ambitious).
Raw lines 268 to 274
275## Metric Review Cadences

Metric Review Cadences

Raw lines 275 to 276
277### Weekly Metrics Check
278**Purpose**: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health.
279**Duration**: 15-30 minutes.
280**Attendees**: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
282**What to review**:
283- North Star metric: current value, week-over-week change
284- Key L1 metrics: any notable movements
285- Active experiments: results and statistical significance
286- Anomalies: any unexpected spikes or drops
287- Alerts: anything that triggered a monitoring alert
289**Action**: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.

Weekly Metrics Check

Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.

What to review:

  • North Star metric: current value, week-over-week change
  • Key L1 metrics: any notable movements
  • Active experiments: results and statistical significance
  • Anomalies: any unexpected spikes or drops
  • Alerts: anything that triggered a monitoring alert

Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.

Raw lines 277 to 290
291### Monthly Metrics Review
292**Purpose**: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications.
293**Duration**: 30-60 minutes.
294**Attendees**: Product team, key stakeholders.
296**What to review**:
297- Full L1 metric scorecard with month-over-month trends
298- Progress against quarterly OKR targets
299- Cohort analysis: are newer cohorts performing better?
300- Feature adoption: how are recent launches performing?
301- Segment analysis: any divergence between user segments?
303**Action**: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.

Monthly Metrics Review

Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.

What to review:

  • Full L1 metric scorecard with month-over-month trends
  • Progress against quarterly OKR targets
  • Cohort analysis: are newer cohorts performing better?
  • Feature adoption: how are recent launches performing?
  • Segment analysis: any divergence between user segments?

Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.

Raw lines 291 to 304
305### Quarterly Business Review
306**Purpose**: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter.
307**Duration**: 60-90 minutes.
308**Attendees**: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
310**What to review**:
311- OKR scoring for the quarter
312- Trend analysis for all L1 metrics over the quarter
313- Year-over-year comparisons
314- Competitive context: market changes and competitor movements
315- What worked and what did not
317**Action**: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.

Quarterly Business Review

Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.

What to review:

  • OKR scoring for the quarter
  • Trend analysis for all L1 metrics over the quarter
  • Year-over-year comparisons
  • Competitive context: market changes and competitor movements
  • What worked and what did not

Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.

Raw lines 305 to 318
319## Dashboard Design Principles

Dashboard Design Principles

Raw lines 319 to 320
321### Effective Product Dashboards
322A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
324**Principles**:
3261. **Start with the question, not the data**. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
3282. **Hierarchy of information**. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
3303. **Context over numbers**. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
3324. **Fewer metrics, more insight**. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
3345. **Consistent time periods**. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
3366. **Visual status indicators**. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
337 - Green: on track or improving
338 - Yellow: needs attention or flat
339 - Red: off track or declining
3417. **Actionability**. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.

Effective Product Dashboards

A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.

Principles:

  1. Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
  1. Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
  1. Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
  1. Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
  1. Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
  1. Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
  2. Green: on track or improving
  3. Yellow: needs attention or flat
  4. Red: off track or declining
  1. Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
Raw lines 321 to 342
343### Dashboard Layout
345**Top row**: North Star metric with trend line and target.
347**Second row**: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
349**Third row**: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
351**Fourth row**: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
353**Bottom / drill-down**: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.

Dashboard Layout

Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.

Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.

Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.

Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.

Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.

Raw lines 343 to 354
355### Dashboard Anti-Patterns
356- **Vanity metrics**: Metrics that always go up but do not indicate health (total signups ever, total page views)
357- **Too many metrics**: Dashboards that require scrolling to see. If it does not fit on one screen, cut metrics.
358- **No comparison**: Raw numbers without context (current value with no previous period or target)
359- **Stale dashboards**: Metrics that have not been updated or reviewed in months
360- **Output dashboards**: Measuring team activity (tickets closed, PRs merged) instead of user and business outcomes
361- **One dashboard for all audiences**: Executives, PMs, and engineers need different views. One size does not fit all.

Dashboard Anti-Patterns

  • Vanity metrics: Metrics that always go up but do not indicate health (total signups ever, total page views)
  • Too many metrics: Dashboards that require scrolling to see. If it does not fit on one screen, cut metrics.
  • No comparison: Raw numbers without context (current value with no previous period or target)
  • Stale dashboards: Metrics that have not been updated or reviewed in months
  • Output dashboards: Measuring team activity (tickets closed, PRs merged) instead of user and business outcomes
  • One dashboard for all audiences: Executives, PMs, and engineers need different views. One size does not fit all.
Raw lines 355 to 362
363### Alerting
364Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
366- **Threshold alerts**: Metric drops below or rises above a critical threshold (error rate > 1%, conversion < 5%)
367- **Trend alerts**: Metric shows sustained decline over multiple days/weeks
368- **Anomaly alerts**: Metric deviates significantly from expected range
370**Alert hygiene**:
371- Every alert should be actionable. If you cannot do anything about it, do not alert on it.
372- Review and tune alerts regularly. Too many false positives and people ignore all alerts.
373- Define an owner for each alert. Who responds when it fires?
374- Set appropriate severity levels. Not everything is P0.

Alerting

Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:

  • Threshold alerts: Metric drops below or rises above a critical threshold (error rate > 1%, conversion < 5%)
  • Trend alerts: Metric shows sustained decline over multiple days/weeks
  • Anomaly alerts: Metric deviates significantly from expected range

Alert hygiene:

  • Every alert should be actionable. If you cannot do anything about it, do not alert on it.
  • Review and tune alerts regularly. Too many false positives and people ignore all alerts.
  • Define an owner for each alert. Who responds when it fires?
  • Set appropriate severity levels. Not everything is P0.
Raw lines 363 to 375
376## Output Format
378Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.

Output Format

Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.

Raw lines 376 to 379
380## Tips
382- Start with the "so what" — what is the most important thing in this metrics review? Lead with that.
383- Absolute numbers without context are useless. Always show comparisons (vs previous period, vs target, vs benchmark).
384- Be careful about attribution. Correlation is not causation. If a metric moved, acknowledge uncertainty about why.
385- Segment analysis often reveals that an aggregate metric masks important differences. A flat overall number might hide one segment growing and another shrinking.
386- Not all metric movements matter. Small fluctuations are noise. Focus attention on meaningful changes.
387- If a metric is missing its target, do not just report the miss — recommend what to do about it.
388- Metrics reviews should drive decisions. If the review does not lead to at least one action, it was not useful.

Tips

  • Start with the "so what" — what is the most important thing in this metrics review? Lead with that.
  • Absolute numbers without context are useless. Always show comparisons (vs previous period, vs target, vs benchmark).
  • Be careful about attribution. Correlation is not causation. If a metric moved, acknowledge uncertainty about why.
  • Segment analysis often reveals that an aggregate metric masks important differences. A flat overall number might hide one segment growing and another shrinking.
  • Not all metric movements matter. Small fluctuations are noise. Focus attention on meaningful changes.
  • If a metric is missing its target, do not just report the miss — recommend what to do about it.
  • Metrics reviews should drive decisions. If the review does not lead to at least one action, it was not useful.
Raw lines 380 to 388

From anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins at 2574e29, 2026-10-27. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.