Skill Tracer
Skills › Knowledge Work Plugins › seo-audit

seo-audit

skill · 190 lines · Apache-2.0 · marketing/skills/seo-audit/SKILL.md

The facts

Its description

Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.

The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.

From its settingsline 3

When it starts

The agent would pick this skill when someone asks about a site's search visibility — auditing SEO health, researching keywords, finding content gaps, checking technical SEO, or comparing against competitors. It is triggered by the slash command or by any of those audit requests.

Things a person might say (the model's guesses)

  • “Can you run an SEO audit on our site, example.com?”
  • “What keywords should we be targeting that we're missing?”
  • “How does our SEO stack up against our two main competitors?”

A model's summary of when it is used.

A model's reading

What it takes when started

<url or topic> [audit type]

What to type after its name when you start it.

From its settingsline 4

Licence

Apache-2.0, from marketing/LICENSE

The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.

From the repositorylicence text

The text

Open on GitHub

Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.

1---
2name: seo-audit
3description: Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.
4argument-hint: "<url or topic> [audit type]"
5---
6
7# /seo-audit
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
11Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.

/seo-audit

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.

Raw lines 1 to 12
13## Trigger
15User runs `/seo-audit` or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.

Trigger

User runs /seo-audit or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.

Raw lines 13 to 16
17## Inputs
19Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:
211. **URL or domain** — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
232. **Audit type** — one of:
24 - **Full site audit** — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
25 - **Keyword research** — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
26 - **Content gap analysis** — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
27 - **Technical SEO check** — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
28 - **Competitor SEO comparison** — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors
30 If not specified, default to **full site audit**.
323. **Target keywords or topics** (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
344. **Competitors** (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.

Inputs

Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:

  1. URL or domain — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
  1. Audit type — one of:
  2. Full site audit — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
  3. Keyword research — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
  4. Content gap analysis — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
  5. Technical SEO check — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
  6. Competitor SEO comparison — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors

If not specified, default to full site audit.

  1. Target keywords or topics (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
  1. Competitors (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.
Raw lines 17 to 35
36## Process
38### 1. Keyword Research
40Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.
42**If ~~SEO tools are connected:**
43- Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
44- Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground
46**If ~~product analytics are connected:**
47- Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions
49**If tools are not connected:**
50- Use web search to research the keyword landscape
51- Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."
53For each keyword opportunity, assess:
54- **Primary keywords** — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
55- **Secondary keywords** — supporting terms and variations
56- **Search volume signals** — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
57- **Keyword difficulty** — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
58- **Long-tail opportunities** — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
59- **Question-based keywords** — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
60- **Intent classification** — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional

1. Keyword Research

Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.

If ~~SEO tools are connected:

  • Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
  • Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground

If ~~product analytics are connected:

  • Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions

If tools are not connected:

  • Use web search to research the keyword landscape
  • Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."

For each keyword opportunity, assess:

  • Primary keywords — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
  • Secondary keywords — supporting terms and variations
  • Search volume signals — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
  • Keyword difficulty — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
  • Long-tail opportunities — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
  • Question-based keywords — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
  • Intent classification — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional
Raw lines 38 to 61
Uses an outside tool ~~product :46
Uses an outside tool MCP :51
62### 2. On-Page SEO Audit
64For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:
66- **Title tags** — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
67- **Meta descriptions** — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
68- **H1 tags** — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
69- **H2/H3 structure** — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
70- **Keyword usage** — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
71- **Internal linking** — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
72- **Image alt text** — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
73- **URL structure** — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth

2. On-Page SEO Audit

For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:

  • Title tags — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
  • Meta descriptions — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
  • H1 tags — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
  • H2/H3 structure — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
  • Keyword usage — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
  • Internal linking — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
  • Image alt text — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
  • URL structure — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth
Raw lines 62 to 74
75### 3. Content Gap Analysis
77Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:
79- **Competitor topic coverage** — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
80- **Content freshness** — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
81- **Thin content** — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
82- **Missing content types** — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
83- **Funnel gaps** — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
84- **Topic clusters** — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content

3. Content Gap Analysis

Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:

  • Competitor topic coverage — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
  • Content freshness — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
  • Thin content — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
  • Missing content types — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
  • Funnel gaps — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
  • Topic clusters — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content
Raw lines 75 to 85
86### 4. Technical SEO Checklist
88Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:
90- **Page speed** — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
91- **Mobile-friendliness** — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
92- **Structured data** — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
93- **Crawlability** — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
94- **Broken links** — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
95- **HTTPS** — secure connection, mixed content issues
96- **Core Web Vitals signals** — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
97- **Indexation** — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks

4. Technical SEO Checklist

Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:

  • Page speed — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
  • Mobile-friendliness — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
  • Structured data — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
  • Crawlability — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
  • Broken links — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
  • HTTPS — secure connection, mixed content issues
  • Core Web Vitals signals — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
  • Indexation — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks
Raw lines 86 to 98
99### 5. Competitor SEO Comparison
101For each competitor, compare:
103- **Keyword overlap** — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
104- **Keyword gaps** — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
105- **Domain authority signals** — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
106- **Content depth** — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
107- **Backlink profile observations** — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
108- **SERP feature ownership** — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
109- **Technical advantages** — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage

5. Competitor SEO Comparison

For each competitor, compare:

  • Keyword overlap — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
  • Keyword gaps — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
  • Domain authority signals — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
  • Content depth — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
  • Backlink profile observations — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
  • SERP feature ownership — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
  • Technical advantages — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage
Raw lines 99 to 110
113### Executive Summary
115Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:
116- The site's biggest strength
117- The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
118- An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues

Executive Summary

Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:

  • The site's biggest strength
  • The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
  • An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues
Raw lines 113 to 119
120### Keyword Opportunity Table
122| Keyword | Est. Difficulty | Opportunity Score | Current Ranking | Intent | Recommended Content Type |
123|---------|----------------|-------------------|-----------------|--------|--------------------------|
125Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.
127Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.

Keyword Opportunity Table

KeywordEst. DifficultyOpportunity ScoreCurrent RankingIntentRecommended Content Type

Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.

Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.

Raw lines 120 to 128
129### On-Page Issues Table
131| Page | Issue | Severity | Recommended Fix |
132|------|-------|----------|-----------------|
134Severity levels:
135- **Critical** — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
136- **High** — significant impact on SEO performance
137- **Medium** — best practice violation, moderate impact
138- **Low** — minor optimization opportunity

On-Page Issues Table

PageIssueSeverityRecommended Fix

Severity levels:

  • Critical — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
  • High — significant impact on SEO performance
  • Medium — best practice violation, moderate impact
  • Low — minor optimization opportunity
Raw lines 129 to 139
140### Content Gap Recommendations
142For each content gap identified, provide:
143- **Topic or keyword** to target
144- **Why it matters** — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
145- **Recommended format** — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
146- **Priority** — high, medium, or low
147- **Estimated effort** — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)

Content Gap Recommendations

For each content gap identified, provide:

  • Topic or keyword to target
  • Why it matters — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
  • Recommended format — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
  • Priority — high, medium, or low
  • Estimated effort — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)
Raw lines 140 to 148
149### Technical SEO Checklist
151| Check | Status | Details |
152|-------|--------|---------|
154Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.

Technical SEO Checklist

CheckStatusDetails

Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.

Raw lines 149 to 155
156### Competitor Comparison Summary
158| Dimension | Your Site | Competitor A | Competitor B | Winner |
159|-----------|-----------|--------------|--------------|--------|
161Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.

Competitor Comparison Summary

DimensionYour SiteCompetitor ACompetitor BWinner

Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.

Raw lines 156 to 162
163### Prioritized Action Plan
165Split recommendations into two categories:
167**Quick Wins (do this week):**
168- Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
169- Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text
171**Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):**
172- Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
173- Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure
175For each action item, include:
176- What to do (specific and concrete)
177- Expected impact (high, medium, low)
178- Effort estimate
179- Dependencies (if any)

Prioritized Action Plan

Split recommendations into two categories:

Quick Wins (do this week):

  • Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
  • Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text

Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):

  • Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
  • Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure

For each action item, include:

  • What to do (specific and concrete)
  • Expected impact (high, medium, low)
  • Effort estimate
  • Dependencies (if any)
Raw lines 163 to 180
181## Follow-Up
183After presenting the audit, ask:
185"Would you like me to:
186- Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
187- Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
188- Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
189- Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
190- Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"

Follow-Up

After presenting the audit, ask:

"Would you like me to:

  • Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
  • Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
  • Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
  • Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
  • Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"
Raw lines 181 to 190

From anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins at 2574e29, 2026-10-27. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.