Skill Tracer
Skills › Knowledge Work Plugins › ticket-triage

ticket-triage

skill · 275 lines · Apache-2.0 · customer-support/skills/ticket-triage/SKILL.md

The facts

Its description

Triage and prioritize a support ticket or customer issue. Use when a new ticket comes in and needs categorization, assigning P1-P4 priority, deciding which team should handle it, or checking whether it's a duplicate or known issue before routing.

The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.

From its settingsline 3

When it starts

The agent picks this skill when a new support ticket or customer issue arrives and needs to be sorted out — categorized, given a P1–P4 priority, checked against known issues and duplicates, and routed to the right team, with a suggested first reply. It is aimed at the moment of intake, before anyone has started working the issue.

Things a person might say (the model's guesses)

  • “We just got this from a customer: their dashboard has been blank since this morning — can you triage it?”
  • “Here's a new ticket from Acme Corp, can you tell me how urgent it is and who should pick it up?”
  • “Can you prioritize this support issue and check whether it's a duplicate of something we already know about?”

A model's summary of when it is used.

A model's reading

What it takes when started

<ticket or issue description>

What to type after its name when you start it.

From its settingsline 4

What it leads to

Other skills this one hands off to, calls, requires or offers instead, as a model read them.

A model's reading

Licence

Apache-2.0, from customer-support/LICENSE

The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.

From the repositorylicence text

The text

Open on GitHub

Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.

1---
2name: ticket-triage
3description: Triage and prioritize a support ticket or customer issue. Use when a new ticket comes in and needs categorization, assigning P1-P4 priority, deciding which team should handle it, or checking whether it's a duplicate or known issue before routing.
4argument-hint: "<ticket or issue description>"
5---
6
7# /ticket-triage
8
9> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md).
11Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

/ticket-triage

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

Raw lines 1 to 12
13## Usage
15```
16/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>
17```
19Examples:
20- `/ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning`
21- `/ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"`
22- `/ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL`
23- `/ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF`

Usage

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

Examples:

  • /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
  • /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
  • /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
  • /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF
Raw lines 13 to 24
25## Workflow
27### 1. Parse the Issue
29Read the input and extract:
31- **Core problem**: What is the customer actually experiencing?
32- **Symptoms**: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
33- **Customer context**: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
34- **Urgency signals**: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
35- **Emotional state**: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?

1. Parse the Issue

Read the input and extract:

  • Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
  • Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
  • Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
  • Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
  • Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?
Raw lines 27 to 36
37### 2. Categorize and Prioritize
39Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:
41- Assign a **primary category** (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
42- Assign a **priority** (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
43- Identify the **product area** the issue maps to

2. Categorize and Prioritize

Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:

  • Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
  • Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
  • Identify the product area the issue maps to
Raw lines 37 to 44
45### 3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues
47Before routing, check available sources:
49- **~~support platform**: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
50- **~~knowledge base**: Check for known issues or existing documentation
51- **~~project tracker**: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request
53Apply the duplicate detection process below.

3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues

Before routing, check available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
  • ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
  • ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request

Apply the duplicate detection process below.

Raw lines 45 to 54
Uses an outside tool ~~support :49
Uses an outside tool ~~knowledge :50
Uses an outside tool ~~project :51
55### 4. Determine Routing
57Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

4. Determine Routing

Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

Raw lines 55 to 58
59### 5. Generate Triage Output
61```
62## Triage: [One-line issue summary]
64**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
65**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
66**Product area:** [Area/team]
68### Issue Summary
69[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]
71### Key Details
72- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
73- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
74- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
75- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
76- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]
78### Routing Recommendation
79**Route to:** [Team or queue]
80**Why:** [Brief reasoning]
82### Suggested Initial Response
83[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
84set expectations, provide workaround if available.
85Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]
87### Internal Notes
88- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
89- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
90- [Escalation triggers to watch for]
91```

5. Generate Triage Output

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]

**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]

### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]

### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]

### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]

### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]

### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]
Raw lines 59 to 92
93### 6. Offer Next Steps
95After presenting the triage:
97- "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
98- "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
99- "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."
101---

6. Offer Next Steps

After presenting the triage:


Raw lines 93 to 102
Names a skill draft-response :96
Names a skill customer-escalation :99
103## Category Taxonomy
105Assign every ticket a **primary category** and optionally a **secondary category**:
107| Category | Description | Signal Words |
108|----------|-------------|-------------|
109| **Bug** | Product is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedly | Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing |
110| **How-to** | Customer needs guidance on using the product | How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with |
111| **Feature request** | Customer wants a capability that doesn't exist | Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting |
112| **Billing** | Payment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issues | Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade |
113| **Account** | Account access, permissions, settings, or user management | Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in |
114| **Integration** | Issues connecting to third-party tools or APIs | API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party |
115| **Security** | Security concerns, data access, or compliance questions | Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability |
116| **Data** | Data quality, migration, import/export issues | Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates |
117| **Performance** | Speed, reliability, or availability issues | Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded |

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

CategoryDescriptionSignal Words
BugProduct is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedlyError, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-toCustomer needs guidance on using the productHow do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature requestCustomer wants a capability that doesn't existWould be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
BillingPayment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issuesCharge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
AccountAccount access, permissions, settings, or user managementLogin, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
IntegrationIssues connecting to third-party tools or APIsAPI, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
SecuritySecurity concerns, data access, or compliance questionsData breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
DataData quality, migration, import/export issuesMissing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
PerformanceSpeed, reliability, or availability issuesSlow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded
Raw lines 103 to 118
119### Category Determination Tips
121- If the customer reports **both** a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
122- If they can't log in due to a bug, category is **Bug** (not Account) — root cause drives the category
123- "It used to work and now it doesn't" = **Bug**
124- "I want it to work differently" = **Feature request**
125- "How do I make it work?" = **How-to**
126- When in doubt, lean toward **Bug** — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Category Determination Tips

  • If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
  • If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
  • "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
  • "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
  • "How do I make it work?" = How-to
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss
Raw lines 119 to 127
128## Priority Framework

Priority Framework

Raw lines 128 to 129
130### P1 — Critical
131**Criteria:** Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.
133- The customer cannot use the product at all
134- Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
135- A security incident is in progress
136- The issue is worsening or expanding in scope
138**SLA expectation:** Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

  • The customer cannot use the product at all
  • Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
  • A security incident is in progress
  • The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

Raw lines 130 to 139
140### P2 — High
141**Criteria:** Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.
143- A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
144- Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
145- The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
146- No reasonable workaround exists
148**SLA expectation:** Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

  • A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
  • Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
  • The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
  • No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

Raw lines 140 to 149
150### P3 — Medium
151**Criteria:** Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.
153- A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
154- The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
155- A single user or small team is affected
156- The customer is not escalating urgently
158**SLA expectation:** Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

  • A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
  • The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
  • A single user or small team is affected
  • The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

Raw lines 150 to 159
160### P4 — Low
161**Criteria:** Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.
163- Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
164- Feature requests and enhancement ideas
165- General questions or how-to inquiries
166- Issues with simple, documented solutions
168**SLA expectation:** Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

  • Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
  • Feature requests and enhancement ideas
  • General questions or how-to inquiries
  • Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Raw lines 160 to 169
170### Priority Escalation Triggers
172Automatically bump priority up when:
173- Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
174- Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
175- The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
176- A workaround that was in place stops working
177- The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

  • Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
  • Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
  • The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
  • A workaround that was in place stops working
  • The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)
Raw lines 170 to 178
179## Routing Rules
181Route tickets based on category and complexity:
183| Route to | When |
184|----------|------|
185| **Tier 1 (frontline support)** | How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets |
186| **Tier 2 (senior support)** | Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues |
187| **Engineering** | Confirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation |
188| **Product** | Feature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps |
189| **Security** | Data access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions |
190| **Billing/Finance** | Refund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments |

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route toWhen
Tier 1 (frontline support)How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support)Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
EngineeringConfirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
ProductFeature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
SecurityData access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/FinanceRefund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments
Raw lines 179 to 191
192## Duplicate Detection
194Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:
1961. **Search by symptom**: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
1972. **Search by customer**: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
1983. **Search by product area**: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
1994. **Check known issues**: Compare against documented known issues
201**If a duplicate is found:**
202- Link the new ticket to the existing one
203- Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
204- Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
205- Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

  1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
  2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
  3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
  4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

  • Link the new ticket to the existing one
  • Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
  • Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
  • Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)
Raw lines 192 to 206
207## Auto-Response Templates by Category

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Raw lines 207 to 208
209### Bug — Initial Response
210```
211Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
212would be disruptive for your work.
214I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
215investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
216can [workaround]."]
218I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.
219```

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.

I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]

I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.
Raw lines 209 to 220
221### How-to — Initial Response
222```
223Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]
225[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
226[Steps or guidance]
228Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
229questions.
230```

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]

[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]

Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.
Raw lines 221 to 231
232### Feature Request — Initial Response
233```
234Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
235would be valuable for your workflow.
237I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
238While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
239directly informs our roadmap priorities.
241[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
242[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]
243```

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.

I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.

[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]
Raw lines 232 to 244
245### Billing — Initial Response
246```
247I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
248look into this for you.
250[If straightforward: resolution details]
251[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
252an answer for you within [timeframe]."]
253```

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.

[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]
Raw lines 245 to 254
255### Security — Initial Response
256```
257Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
258seriously and are reviewing this immediately.
260I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
261We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.
263[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
264[protective action]."]
265```

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.

I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.

[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]
Raw lines 255 to 266
267## Triage Best Practices
2691. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
2702. Categorize by **root cause**, not just the symptom described
2713. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
2724. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
2735. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
2746. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
2757. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority

Triage Best Practices

  1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
  2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
  3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
  4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
  5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
  6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
  7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority
Raw lines 267 to 275

From anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins at 2574e29, 2026-10-27. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.