domain-modeling
The facts
Its description
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
The description the agent reads to decide when to use it.
When it starts
The agent picks this skill when the conversation turns to the project's own vocabulary or its recorded decisions — arguing over what a term should mean, or wanting to write or edit a GLOSSARY.md or an ADR — rather than when it is merely reading a glossary for vocabulary.
Things a person might say (the model's guesses)
- “I keep saying 'account' — should that be Customer or User?”
- “Let's write an ADR for using Postgres as the write model.”
- “Can we add 'cancellation' to the glossary?”
A model's summary of when it is used.
Files it mentions
./GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md, ./ADR-FORMAT.md
Files the text names, such as ones to read or write. Found by matching words, so treat them as pointers.
What leads to it
- ask-matt hands off to this when the words, not the process, are the problem ask-matt, line 66
- grill-with-docs calls this grill-with-docs, line 7
- improve-codebase-architecture calls this as decisions crystallize improve-codebase-architecture, line 66
- triage calls this if the request needs fleshing out triage, line 76
- wayfinder calls this wayfinder, line 79
Other skills that hand off to this one, call it, require it or offer it instead, as a model read them.
Licence
MIT, from LICENSE
The terms its author shares it under, which let it be shown here.
Other files in this skill (3) Close
The text
Most marks come from matching words in the file, so treat them as pointers.
Domain Modeling
Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading GLOSSARY.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── GLOSSARY.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/If a GLOSSARY-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── GLOSSARY-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── GLOSSARY.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── GLOSSARY.md
│ └── docs/adr/Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no GLOSSARY.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Raw lines 42 to 43Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in GLOSSARY.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y. Which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account': do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Raw lines 48 to 51Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Raw lines 52 to 55Cross-reference with code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible. Which is right?"
Raw lines 56 to 59Update GLOSSARY.md inline
When a term is resolved, update GLOSSARY.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md.
GLOSSARY.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat GLOSSARY.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.
Offer ADRs sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
- Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
- The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.
Raw lines 66 to 74From mattpocock/skills at 4ae2317, 2026-10-31. Skills read by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on 2026-11-04. Summary and techniques by Claude Opus 5.5 on 2026-11-06.